Bridgerton

Attog

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,343
1,768
No, it's blackwashing. I read that the books didn't have any of this and it was the producer of the show that decided to do it.
I haven't watched the show but I saw this article headline today and thought it was funny, given my question to you about it looking like an alternate reality of history.

bridgerton.jpg
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

TomServo

<Bronze Donator>
6,368
8,351
violent porn sex scenes in a georgian era romance. yes jane austen loved anal.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Mrs. Haus

Angry Redhead
<Bronze Donator>
508
6,328
I haven't watched the show but I saw this article headline today and thought it was funny, given my question to you about it looking like an alternate reality of history.

View attachment 330338
So stupid. Seriously. The books are standard, historical romances and contain all the standard tropes and norms of the genre. It is not fantasy romance, which is its own genre. They just didn't want to have an all white cast so made up some bullshit. Even though they could have picked one of a thousand other romance series that DO have non-white characters and storylines.
 

Goatface

Avatar of War Slayer
9,276
14,344
nerflix's numbers are all BS
Netflix defines a "view" as any piece of content watched for at least two minutes - meaning its numbers are not comparable to traditional TV viewing figures.

that started at the end of 2019, it used to be 70% of movie or 1 episode of a series to be counted as a view.
 

slippery

<Bronze Donator>
7,891
7,704
Ok, I was pretty much forced to watch this (wife is a Grey's fan) and I honestly thought they did about as good a job with it as they could have.

They talk about race exactly once in the first season to explain how blacks got positions of power and in typical Shonda fashion the reason is 'true love.' The conversation lasts 20 seconds and actually seems forced. 2 of the best 3 characters are black and it could honestly be much worse if they wanted it to be.
I feel pretty much the same. Aside from thinking forcing color into the show is stupid, it's nothing of note in the show really. The show is compelling, and the cast is decent. I liked both Simon and Daphne, along with most of the Bridgerton family. The first 30 minutes I almost turned it off, but then I watched it in 2 days.
 

Cybsled

Avatar of War Slayer
16,432
12,060
Only reason I heard of this show is the actor who voices G'raha Tia in FFXIV is in this show lol
 

rhinohelix

<Gold Donor>
2,867
4,669
Yeah, while I was sick my wife watched this in the room with me. I woke up to Mad king George and the Black Queen and couldn't figure out why many British nobles were black. Even explained, I still didn't get the seeming large numbers in the mix. When I saw the Shondaland production card, though, then I knew. They should have just made them all black and been done with it; made the villagers white or something striking. What I saw was almost Skinimax levels of Get down, although my wife swore it was often more tame. Of course with a black male lead and dainty white female lead, because <reasons>.

The show is not bad per se, its plot is typical of such fare set in the Regency Period (the comparison for me was made to 90's teen drama's for the plot). In the 1.5 episodes, I watched, the race issue faded as not a big deal. As my wife described it, it was "the world as MLK imagined it." In a not-insane world, this would even be laudable. Today, though, blue checkmarks are talking about how evil whiteness is, attacks on white people, and how spelling and grammar are a sign of "white supremacy". We don't live in a sane world.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users