Candyman (2020)

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Gold Donor>
14,236
11,658
0.00 star(s) Rating: 0.00/5 2 Votes
Title: Candyman (2020)

Tagline: Dare To Say His Name

Genre: Horror, Thriller

Director: Nia DaCosta

Cast: Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Teyonah Parris, Tony Todd, Cassie Kramer, Nathan Stewart-Jarrett, Colman Domingo, Rebecca Spence, Kyle Kaminsky, Carl Clemons-Hopkins, Cedric Mays, Christiana Clark, Nancy Pender, Malic White, Aaron Crippen, Hannah Love Jones, Sarah Lo, Dan Fierro, Ashland Thomas, Matthew J. Valadez, Hans Dieter Wolff, Brian King, Pamela Jones, Vanessa Williams, Miriam Moss, Mark Montgomery, Genesis Denise Hale, Rodney L Jones III, Heidi Grace Engerman, Torrey Hanson

Release: 2020-06-11

Plot: This summer, Oscar® winner Jordan Peele unleashes a fresh take on the blood-chilling urban legend that your friend’s older sibling probably told you about at a sleepover: Candyman. Rising filmmaker Nia DaCosta (Little Woods) directs this contemporary incarnation of the cult classic. For as long as residents can remember, the housing projects of Chicago’s Cabrini Green neighborhood were terrorized by a word-of-mouth ghost story about a supernatural killer with a hook for a hand, easily summoned by those daring to repeat his name five times into a mirror. In present day, a decade after the last of the Cabrini towers were torn down, visual artist Anthony McCoy (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II; HBO’s Watchmen, Us) and his girlfriend, gallery director Brianna Cartwright (Teyonah Parris; If Beale Street Could Talk, The Photograph), move into a luxury loft condo in Cabrini, now gentrified beyond recognition and inhabited by upwardly mobile millennials.

 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,669
212,888
did anyone ask for this? was there anything left unresolved in the trilogy that they needed to sew up?
 
  • 3Like
  • 1Direct to DVD
Reactions: 3 users

LiquidDeath

Magnus Deadlift the Fucktiger
4,889
11,292
2Gg.gif
 
  • 6Solidarity
  • 3Like
Reactions: 8 users

Void

Experiencer
<Gold Donor>
9,412
11,077
Tony Todd bitches!!
Seriously, I don't want a Candyman that isn't him. He can still easily play the part, because honestly who gives a fuck how old a supernatural killer looks? And his voice was always perfect for it.

I haven't seen Us yet, and I thought Get Out was extremely mediocre, so coupled with his public statements I'm really starting to actively dislike Jordan Peele, despite liking almost everything they ever did on Key & Peele. Kind of sad, honestly.

This makes me realize that I have no idea if I've seen all three of the original movies though.
 
  • 4Like
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 4 users

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Gold Donor>
14,236
11,658
Seriously, I don't want a Candyman that isn't him. He can still easily play the part, because honestly who gives a fuck how old a supernatural killer looks? And his voice was always perfect for it.

I haven't seen Us yet, and I thought Get Out was extremely mediocre, so coupled with his public statements I'm really starting to actively dislike Jordan Peele, despite liking almost everything they ever did on Key & Peele. Kind of sad, honestly.

This makes me realize that I have no idea if I've seen all three of the original movies though.

Keep in mind this Nia DaCosta directed and not Jordan Peele unlike US and Get Out. He apparently contributed to the writing but they’re just pushing his name for marketing.
 

Springbok

Karen
<Gold Donor>
9,014
12,566
Seriously, I don't want a Candyman that isn't him. He can still easily play the part, because honestly who gives a fuck how old a supernatural killer looks? And his voice was always perfect for it.

I haven't seen Us yet, and I thought Get Out was extremely mediocre, so coupled with his public statements I'm really starting to actively dislike Jordan Peele, despite liking almost everything they ever did on Key & Peele. Kind of sad, honestly.

This makes me realize that I have no idea if I've seen all three of the original movies though.

Peele is an overrated hack, Key was the funny behind that show
 
  • 3Dislike
  • 2Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 5 users

Bandwagon

Kolohe
<Silver Donator>
22,714
59,529
Peele is an overrated hack, Key was the funny behind that show
*Both* of those guys are fucking legends as performers on that show and I've never seen anything else that is so consistently hilarious as Key & Peele. Maybe one of them deserves way more credit for everything other than the acting portion, but neither one of them are hacks.
 
  • 5Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 5 users

Angerz

Trakanon Raider
1,234
826
Because the original had references to slavery in it and Jordan Peele has to remake it into a whites bad, blacks great story. It is his mission in life even though he is half white.

He needs to cut out the dumb remake shit and do weird originals. I thought US was great.

The Candyman literally exists because he fell in love with a white woman and then white people killed him by cutting off his hand, covering him in honey so bees would attack him, then burning him in a bonfire. And then the segregation of the black people to the ghetto between two nice white neighborhoods. White people were already the root of the problem.

This looks to be a soft reboot as well as a sequel? Tony Todd credited as The Candyman and the main character is the kid from the first movie. And he is the one that wanted Peele to do the modern take (at least a vocal proponent).

And it's not like Cabrini-Green wasn't a real place and wasn't torn down to make way for nicer neighborhoods. "Gentrified the black neighborhood, inherited the black ghosts" is arguably a more interesting take for a soft reboot than we have seen for most movie franchises.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,669
212,888
The Candyman literally exists because he fell in love with a white woman and then white people killed him by cutting off his hand, covering him in honey so bees would attack him, then burning him in a bonfire. And then the segregation of the black people to the ghetto between two nice white neighborhoods. White people were already the root of the problem.

This looks to be a soft reboot as well as a sequel? Tony Todd credited as The Candyman and the main character is the kid from the first movie. And he is the one that wanted Peele to do the modern take (at least a vocal proponent).

And it's not like Cabrini-Green wasn't a real place and wasn't torn down to make way for nicer neighborhoods. "Gentrified the black neighborhood, inherited the black ghosts" is arguably a more interesting take for a soft reboot than we have seen for most movie franchises.
watch the first movie, those buildings were literal shit. if they werent "gentrified", they would have been knocked down anyway. its all so tiresome.
 
  • 1Picard
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Angerz

Trakanon Raider
1,234
826
watch the first movie, those buildings were literal shit. if they werent "gentrified", they would have been knocked down anyway. its all so tiresome.

It was a real place. And not particularly exaggerated. They lasted until 2011. And probably could have lasted longer.

Although the shit part of your sentence is not wrong and probably under selling how bad Cabrini Green was.

It's also not redeveloped yet in real life, as far ad I know, at least not completely
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,669
212,888
It was a real place. And not particularly exaggerated. They lasted until 2011. And probably could have lasted longer.

Although the shit part of your sentence is not wrong and probably under selling how bad Cabrini Green was.

It's also not redeveloped yet in real life, as far ad I know, at least not completely
There was a PBS doc on Cabrini Green a while back. i wasnt sure if they did gentrify it, but yes, it was a shithole almost from the start. i am surprised they waited this long to knock it all down. the people they interviewed didnt have very good things to say about living there, even back in the day. it was a fitting location for filming Candyman. but now? eh who cares anymore? they did 3 movies on it.
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
25,537
12,023
Sammy Davis Jr is the real candyman. I never saw the originals, but I saw enough of them to know they were good. I will use this as an excuse to watch them and then watch this.
 

Rajaah

Honorable Member
<Gold Donor>
11,222
14,894

It's an outstanding movie in terms of the direction, the story, the musical score. I mean everything about this movie works, IMO. It's a solid 8.5 out of 10 type of movie and I really liked it...as a completely fictional movie, which I had to turn my brain off and absorb it as.

Unfortunately, after the movie was over and my brain processed it more fully as social commentary on the real world, it dropped to like a 2/10. You know how the original has plenty of racial overtones, ya? Well, they cranked that up to 11 for this one. It's basically nonstop social commentary and racial overtones. The villain of the movie isn't the Candyman, it's white people and the police. Police are CONSTANTLY portrayed as the real threat.

The cast is almost entirely black, which is fine, and are all portrayed as being super-intelligent socialites...which is fine, but when contrasted with how most of the white people in the movie were portrayed as violent thugs, it quickly starts to come off as propaganda. When the characters in the movie talk about other people they always mention the person's race. Like when they call back to the original movie and go "A woman came to Cabrini-Green...a white woman" very dramatically.

Someone calls the police because someone else is injured? You expect the police to show up and administer medical care or something. Not in this movie! They'll have the sound of police sirens slowly escalating in the distance until it's blaring over everything like some sort of menacing Nazgul screech, then police will burst into the room and open fire for no reason whatsoever.

The main character's name is Breonna, I think, which is so on-the-nose. After police shoot her boyfriend for absolutely no reason, they tell her that she better tell investigators that "he was coming at us with a weapon" or else. It's like...body cameras are a thing that exist, yet apparently none of the cops in this movie are ever wearing one.

The very first scene of the movie, IIRC, is one of the main characters as a kid playing with paper dolls and having a cop chase a black guy who is going "I didn't do nothing!"

The movie borders on self-parody if you're watching as someone informed on the true nature of BLM and so on in the modern era. Literally everything is attributed to race in this movie. There's a scene where they talk about how the failed state of the projects is white people's fault, because "white people give us the projects, then they cut us off from help and let us die, then they move in and turn it into a Whole Foods". Like this revolving circle of logic that doesn't entirely stand up to scrutiny but everyone in the movie follows it.

The end credits are a montage of black people being horribly killed in all sorts of brutal ways by white people throughout history. It's all animated because Lord knows 80+% of the things they show you probably never happened. I had to get up and leave at that point cause it was like "we get it"

As a fictional movie, it's good. However, know that if you see it you'll be subjected to a two-hour propaganda screed. They set up further sequels as well, since there are now lots of Candymen (as a new Candyman is created every time a black person is brutally killed by white people). They also tried to make the Candyman into the hero of the story rather than a monster, sort of this avenging reckoning. Almost everyone he kills in the movie are white people, and the final scene is him going on a rampage and brutally killing like a dozen police.

If nothing else it might be worth seeing because it's such a window into what the purveyors of the modern era want everyone to think and believe. The opening credits are a pan of an upside-down city and it's pretty fitting considering how "through the looking glass" we are with this shit.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 3 users

jayrebb

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
13,911
13,765
The movie borders on self-parody if you're watching as someone informed on the true nature of BLM and so on in the modern era.

I was noping out until I got to this part. I can manage a watch through that lens.

The constant race references in the dialogue though "a white woman" sound obnoxious. The rest I can deal with.
 
Movie information in first post provided by The Movie Database