Deathwalker Plans 26 Boxing WoW
- Thread starter Sam DeathWalker_foh
- Start date
Well Sam using yourself is a terrible example simply because you"re more than likely clinically insane and would have an easy time testifying that in court I"m sure. But yes, if a 30 year old was paying someone as mentally challenged as you it would be taking advantage of you.Sam DeathWalker said:
Any righteous 30 year old would know that it is WRONG to pay a 15 year old for sexual favors. The fact that you can"t see this is frightening.
Christ, any righteous person would know that paying for sex period is wrong. The fact that you have to pay for sex should be a sign that you are fucking strange and nobody would touch you for who you are. Find serious fucking help I am not joking in the slightest.
Dang even not dressed up Im kinda hot.
I can"t even see the reflection off my dome cause my future"s so bright.
Check out dat Grill. SDW in da house!
I can"t even see the reflection off my dome cause my future"s so bright.
Check out dat Grill. SDW in da house!
Wrong again, 18 is when you may legally pay for sex. It"s amazing how you can be so stupid with an IQ of 144.
Section 182 only deals with those 15 and under you have another section for me to read?
Section 182 only deals with those 15 and under you have another section for me to read?
Any righteous 30 year old would know that it is WRONG to pay a 15 year old for sexual favors. The fact that you can"t see this is frightening.
Wrong exactly how? Is it wrong for a 30 year old to pay a 15 year old money to mow the lawn?
Ok if your 15 year old daughter wanted to have FREE sex with 43 year old Johny Depp would you let her?
Wrong exactly how? Is it wrong for a 30 year old to pay a 15 year old money to mow the lawn?
Ok if your 15 year old daughter wanted to have FREE sex with 43 year old Johny Depp would you let her?
You know given taht there are over 5000 views since the Megans picture you have to wonder exactly why there are not a lot more negitive comments.
Except for one or two people its the same crew that slammed me for my WoW prowess ....
The Gobble Gobble Turkey Brigaid.
Except for one or two people its the same crew that slammed me for my WoW prowess ....
The Gobble Gobble Turkey Brigaid.
Also why is no one commenting on the case where a 14 year old female killed her 60 year old mother for interfering with her relationship with her 19 year old boyfriend by threating him with the laws we are discussing.
What do you make of that?
What do you make of that?
Quineloe
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 6,978
- 4,463
same fucking 182 hereSam DeathWalker said:
(2) Ebenso wird eine Person ?ber achtzehn Jahren bestraft, die eine Person unter achtzehn Jahren dadurch missbraucht, dass sie gegen Entgelt sexuelle Handlungen an ihr vornimmt oder an sich von ihr vornehmen l?sst.
person > 18 pays for sex with person < 18 = crime.
More like the use of violence (prosecution by law which uses vilence) is not a wise solution to any problem and causes those you use violence (legal or otherwise) to use violence against you.
Thats not in the 182 I have maybe it changed.
Thats not in the 182 I have maybe it changed.
Also more murders are committed by those over 18 then those under 18 ... is that evidence that adults are unstable?
In fact way more crimes are commited by those over 18 then those under 18, what does that lead you to conclude?
In fact way more crimes are commited by those over 18 then those under 18, what does that lead you to conclude?
I feel fucking dirty for even having googled to find the stat rape criminal code.
So in short, yes you were right about the previous criminal codes (sorry for not being up on my Pedo trivia). However, you still would have been charged, faced trial, and been conviced under Canadian law.
Since you like links so much, here"s the old law off the justice.gc.ca website
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/dept-min/clp/faq.html
The paragraph that you need to look at is the following:
On a side note, the law was completely antiquated. It is a relic of 1890 where life expectancy did not exceed 45 years of age (your link:http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html).
And to wrap up on a personal note: I"m currently 31, yes the exact same age as you were when you got caught with your dick in a minor. The very thought of having sex with a 15 year old girl sends my dick crawling up inside me, and no amount of coaxing would be able to get it out.
So yes, you are a sick fuck. And yes, be glad you live in Cali because there are still lots of places that your antics would have wound you up dead in a ditch...redneck Alberta with your "pedo rape for everyone" antiquated laws included.
So in short, yes you were right about the previous criminal codes (sorry for not being up on my Pedo trivia). However, you still would have been charged, faced trial, and been conviced under Canadian law.
Since you like links so much, here"s the old law off the justice.gc.ca website
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/dept-min/clp/faq.html
The paragraph that you need to look at is the following:
To put into summary: She has to be 18 for you to pay her, give her money for drugs, use her as an escort, take pictures of her, or generally be a fucking douchebag. You failed and would have been charged under Canadian law just as you were charged under California law.
On a side note, the law was completely antiquated. It is a relic of 1890 where life expectancy did not exceed 45 years of age (your link:http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html).
And to wrap up on a personal note: I"m currently 31, yes the exact same age as you were when you got caught with your dick in a minor. The very thought of having sex with a 15 year old girl sends my dick crawling up inside me, and no amount of coaxing would be able to get it out.
So yes, you are a sick fuck. And yes, be glad you live in Cali because there are still lots of places that your antics would have wound you up dead in a ditch...redneck Alberta with your "pedo rape for everyone" antiquated laws included.
That there are more people over the age of majority than under it? And the vast majority of parents are doing a good job at controlling what their kids do?Sam DeathWalker said:
That is an excellent point about life expectency.
In old England it was 12 at one time.
So what happened as we lived longer 15 year olds got stupider?
If they were considered mature enough 200 years ago (or whatever) at 12 to have sex but not now because we live longer?
So at any rate about 5 generations ago everyone in the world was a Pedophile. So basically the human race has been Pedophiles for 99.9999999 percent of its existance.
In old England it was 12 at one time.
So what happened as we lived longer 15 year olds got stupider?
If they were considered mature enough 200 years ago (or whatever) at 12 to have sex but not now because we live longer?
So at any rate about 5 generations ago everyone in the world was a Pedophile. So basically the human race has been Pedophiles for 99.9999999 percent of its existance.
So basically you are saying its illegal with pay and legal without pay.
That kinda eliminates all the Pregnacy Prevention and STD argument.
Lets see the one who gets paid is stupid but the one who dons"t make any money is the smart one ...... well ummm.
That kinda eliminates all the Pregnacy Prevention and STD argument.
Lets see the one who gets paid is stupid but the one who dons"t make any money is the smart one ...... well ummm.