Desktop Computers

a_skeleton_05

<Banned>
13,843
34,508
Youre talking a 5-10% performance difference but a $75-100 more expensive system. At least 8700k compared to 2700x

I'm talking the difference between needing to lower settings or not. A stable frame rate or not. Headroom in spiky performance games/scenes or not. And even if I was just talking about 5-10% performance metrics, then it would still matter as we're talking about hardware here. More performance for the money is always relevant.

Note that I'm not even bashing Ryzen here, I'm just correcting your statement that the CPU doesn't matter outside of high refresh/1080p which hasn't been the case for quite some time. The days of slapping an OC'd 2500k into a rig and being good to go with no concerns are gone. Games like the new AC games are core hogs, and they're not the only ones, and even in some of those games IPC matters because the main thread can bottleneck the rest of it.

Hardware purchases require choices based on a lot of factors, both brands have their place in that process.
 

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
25,393
37,464
So price vs performance, which to get? Like I said I play in 1080p and have a 1070. Not expecting ultra here just high. My computer takes a shit with BF 5 playing. I will have a smooth 90 then other areas it dips to 40s and shit when tons of players are around. This is the first game that taxed my system. I ws playing Destiny 2 on ultra and getting 90.
 
Last edited:

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
25,393
37,464
Also another question. Never really upgraded before, jsut usually bought all new shit before. Could I just get Mo-Bo, proc, memory, new cooler and just plug in my old drives with win already installed? I dont want to clean my shit, its already clean.

Here is what im thinking...

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700K 3.7 GHz 6-Core Processor ($339.99 @ Newegg)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master - Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler ($27.89 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: ASRock - Z370 Extreme4 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($109.99 @ Newegg)
Memory: Corsair - Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory ($129.99 @ Amazon)
Total: $607.86
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-11-19 14:40 EST-0500



Also my microcenter has one of these puppies for only $50 more...

1542656640831.png

Worth?


Or the 8700K for..

1542656691158.png


Or say fuck it and get one of these puppies...

1542657805169.png
 
Last edited:

Denamian

Night Janitor
<Nazi Janitors>
7,182
18,956
Also another question. Never really upgraded before, jsut usually bought all new shit before. Could I just get Mo-Bo, proc, memory, new cooler and just plug in my old drives with win already installed? I dont want to clean my shit, its already clean.

You can definitely do this, though you might want to uninstall and mobo specific drivers and whatnot before you swap out part. Reinstalling windows is still ideal and it's why I have a separate SSD for just windows, so I can wipe it and reinstall with little hassle.

Of those 3 CPUs, the 8700k is the best value. The 8086 is essentially an overclocked 8700k to begin with and the 9900k is almost double the price, but not double the performance.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

wilkxus

<Bronze Donator>
518
210
Def stick with 8700K on Intel side.Will be fine for your 1070 and resolve your CPU bottleneck well. Double CPU price not worth it for gaming, might as well save the $ for a 1070 upgrade or for a nicer monitor.
 

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
<Gold Donor>
18,680
34,791
It won't be useless, but you're adding the USB stack overhead into the equation. I certainly wouldn't want games or OS on that. Is m.2 an option? Pcie ?

I might be able to do PCIe. Didn't even know that was a thing.
 

wilkxus

<Bronze Donator>
518
210
Who wants to be stuck with a drive permanently wired to a pcie card though? nvme is smaller, nicer to resell or salvage & reuse for a future build.
 

a_skeleton_05

<Banned>
13,843
34,508
Also another question. Never really upgraded before, jsut usually bought all new shit before. Could I just get Mo-Bo, proc, memory, new cooler and just plug in my old drives with win already installed? I dont want to clean my shit, its already clean.

Here is what im thinking...

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700K 3.7 GHz 6-Core Processor ($339.99 @ Newegg)
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master - Hyper 212 EVO 82.9 CFM Sleeve Bearing CPU Cooler ($27.89 @ OutletPC)
Motherboard: ASRock - Z370 Extreme4 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard ($109.99 @ Newegg)
Memory: Corsair - Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4-3000 Memory ($129.99 @ Amazon)
Total: $607.86
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-11-19 14:40 EST-0500



Also my microcenter has one of these puppies for only $50 more...

View attachment 183540
Worth?


Or the 8700K for..

View attachment 183541

Or say fuck it and get one of these puppies...

View attachment 183542

Heads up. That's not an 8700k. It's an 8700 non-k. Can't overclock it which means it's pointless within that price-range. Edit- The pic one you posted, not the pcpartpicker link
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
<Gold Donor>
18,680
34,791
Well there's that but I meant actual pcie drives

Is USB really even that large of a bottleneck? USB 3.0 is 5Gbps and eSATA is 6. Will the difference even be that noticeable, especially when compared to your typical HDD?
 

Lunis

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,257
1,484
I'm still using my build from 2016. 6700k & gtx 1080. This will probably last me at least another 2 years considering how meh the rtx series is.
tumblr_pif4l9XDpC1y086owo1_1280.jpg
 

Noodleface

A Mod Real Quick
37,961
14,508
Is USB really even that large of a bottleneck? USB 3.0 is 5Gbps and eSATA is 6. Will the difference even be that noticeable, especially when compared to your typical HDD?
Tough so say. Maybe not, but I wouldn't feel comfortable doing it.
 

wilkxus

<Bronze Donator>
518
210
Is USB really even that large of a bottleneck? USB 3.0 is 5Gbps and eSATA is 6. Will the difference even be that noticeable, especially when compared to your typical HDD?
Yes.
  • Latency is the biggest advantage of the SSD and. USB will add a lot of latency.
  • It will also add CPU overhead for long sustained writes to your USB SSD (as opposed to DMA over SATA).
  • No Read/Write cache for external disk (again slower, especially with small game files)
All these negate the main reasons for getting an SSDs. Might even negatively impact your gaming performance.
Do you need more storage space period, or just more fast SSD space? What drives do you have internally?
 

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,963
I think I would be OK with an external HD if it and my pc had thunderbolt capabilities. Modern thunderbolt capabilities.
 

brekk

Dancing Dino Superstar
<Bronze Donator>
2,191
1,746
I really need another SSD this year for gaming. I think I'm going to go with the 1TB 860 Evo. Issue is, I fucking hate installing new drives in my old ass case, and I think I might be out of SATA ports anyhow. Am I going to render the SSD thing worthless by using an enclosure, or are the speeds over USB fine compared to SATA?

How many drives do you currently have installed?? Unless your system is ancient it should have 6-8 SATA connectors.

USB3.0 will be AWFUL for anything program related.
 

Hekotat

FoH nuclear response team
12,025
11,485
always had a problem with a few games having micro stutters, this fix someone found on era helped me out a lot
Windows 10 intermittent game stutter

Turned off network discovery in Status, Network Status, Sharing Options:

PaSQJ9Z.jpg


Another one is Windows 10 fullscreen optimizations, it helps on some games if you still have stuttering.

Right click on .exe > properties > compatibility > Disable full screen optimizations
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user