I lost the silicon lotto with my 3570k. It only does 4.0 reliably. Anything higher and the event log starts shitting out errors left and right. Up the volts and it gets super toasty, even with good cooling. I could de-lid, size down the TS/Die gap, but that would only get me to 4.2 GHz. No real point, thus my desire to get a new CPU/Mainboard.Yeah, you'd get more bang for your buck with just putting that 3570k into a new motherboard and spending the savings on not buying a new processor on a better video card, or bigger SSD or something. An upgrade from a 3570k to a 4570k is going to be pretty underwhelming(5% performance increase...maybe), unless you need the better onboard video for some reason.
In fact, the 3570k overclocks better/easier than the 4570k, so by the time you clock your 3570k at like 4.2 or 4.4ghz, it's probably going to give you the exact same performance in gaming as the 4570k at 4.0 or so.
I just looked them up, they don't seem ridiculous. I assume this is a next-gen only game.So, does anyone else think the min requirements for CoD: Ghosts and Watch Dogs are total bullshit?
Nope, both are pretty much on all systems.I just looked them up, they don't seem ridiculous. I assume this is a next-gen only game.
I have to assume then that the 360/PS3 versions are massively cut down. Essentially what you are looking at are the kind of systems requirements you would expect for a game revolving around some sort of important simulation.Nope, both are pretty much on all systems.
I hadn't even noticed that. Yea, my last computer had a Core 2 Quad and I built it in... mid 2007. The 400 series is the first DX11 SM5 card and those came out in 2010. So yea, it is about time.Well to be fair, on those Watch Dog minimum specs, the processors are over 4 years old, and DX11 video cards have been around just as long (all of that is 2009 Technology)
PC gaming had been moving at a snails pace the last half decade, I'm glad to see the technology envelope starting to get pushed a little bit again. And heck, as far as RAM goes, the last PC I built that had less than 8GB of RAM in it was probably 2005-ish(the PC I used from 05-08 had 4GB)
Not only that but you can also crossfire the new R2X0 series with last gen's 7000 series. The green team should have thought of that idea...Damn, if it's consistently faster than a 770 across the board, that's a hell of a deal. Hell, even if it's only equivalent to a 770, that's still a great deal for $100 less.
If you're a 7970 owner, there's no real reason to upgrade just yet (unless you do 2x R290X Crossfire). In one year's time, all you'll have to do is pop in a R280x and you're done. I'm really liking AMD's affordability but my huge epeen won't allow me to buy their stuff.But why would you want to? At that point you're basically just running dual 7000-series cards. Might as well buy a 2nd 7000 series, which will soon take a nice price drop I'm sure once all these new cards hit the streets.
Look at the recommended processor they have.... That shit is like from the early 2000's so your shit will be fine for a long time. That i7 recommendation is stupid because we all know that no games take advantage of 8 cores. and that right there is the core of your system. As to the video card? Well thats one thing you will probably have to upgrade in a year or two, LIKE YOU WERE TOLD WHEN YOU BOUGHT YOUR SHIT.Whelp, hoping specs don't rise to much more. RAM and video card I can do in a year or two, but fuck upgrading everything already.
I'm okay with upgrading the video card, I was just worried about having to buy another board, another processor, etc, already. Lol.Look at the recommended processor they have.... That shit is like from the early 2000's so your shit will be fine for a long time. That i7 recommendation is stupid because we all know that no games take advantage of 8 cores. and that right there is the core of your system. As to the video card? Well thats one thing you will probably have to upgrade in a year or two, LIKE YOU WERE TOLD WHEN YOU BOUGHT YOUR SHIT.