Dune: Part Three
- Thread starter Izo
- Start date
Hateyou
Not Great, Not Terrible
- 18,752
- 50,891
Have you read the books? They have kids. They butchered the story for the movies though so I could see why non-book readers would think this. Him and Chani stay together in the books. Been a while since I read them but I don’t think she really cared he had to marry the empress, unlike the movie. He never bangs the empress and just stays with chani. Guessing the movie he will just reveal he married her for the title and still lives chani and she’ll be like “deadass? bet” and it will move along.
Juvarisx
Florida
- 5,554
- 7,414
The kid stuff will be revealed as prior to the end of part 2, and prior to when he drank the poison, and why she went fuck Paul at the end of the movie (she is wearing the blue head thing). I never hated she had it with him, I never particularly liked that she was cool with it. I imagine they will reconcile after the Elder gets killed hence the twins being cast. Basically a roundabout way to get to the same point without a bunch of women going "Why the fuck didnt she yeet his ass"
I doubt he bangs the Empress in this either, in his mind its just political and she is against him anyways.
Last edited:
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 49,602
- 109,227
I know they have kids.
I meant at the end of part 2 she runs off butthurt and throughout the entire movie had been a dissenting voice. If that is how things ended why would she ever come back to Paul?
Everything about her character was absolutely awful in part 2, I don't see that changing for Messiah with how 2 ended.
- 2
- 1
- 11,438
- 48,987
Yeah, I finally just got around to watching part II…it really kinda sucked. It wasn’t outright bad, but between Chani becoming a girl boss, and not at all knowing her place, regarding a prophesied savior with super deterministic, omniscience, along with pushing story elements around, and taking out all the color of the movies, the fights are meh, compared to 2049, this isn’t good. The castings aren’t right, pretty much none of them hit the mark outside of maybe Javier Barden. Brolin, even, perhaps because he was given such little screen time, no. Feyd-Rautha basically introduced in such away that he essentially existed to be killed, like oh yeah there’s this guy, you have to kill him because its in the books.
Last edited:
Furry
Email Loading Please Wait
- 27,896
- 41,338
Part 2 isn't as good as part 1, and honestly the changes from the books in both detracted from the story. But not enough that it felt like it was insulting to me. Plus the cinema of some scenes really is quite amazing. In the books, Feyd is pretty much a bumbling buffoon meant to be killed off too, so him being downplayed isn't that big a loss.
Peter Dinklage playing Bijaz is worth the price of admission alone, lmao.
- 11,438
- 48,987
Like I said it’s not outright bad, it’s not nearly as good as it could have been, and the changes that have worsened it / deviated from the source material, are all by intent, it’s not like a lack of budget etc…, the clear reason for example for why Feyd feels tacked on is because they didn’t spend the time doing the proper world building, especially since they took the source material of only the first book and split it into three movies…time was literally what they had to take advantage of instead they just make him exist at the beginning of the second part so his whole existence can be wrapped up at the end.
Last edited:
