At the risk of negs, objectively speaking I actually think the change (from what little we know) is an improvement over the old lore, in some ways. The original EverQuest lore was kind of convoluted, and generic in many ways. In the revision, the gods are a bit more complicated - and the duality of their nature makes them a bit more interesting and not as one-dimensional. I have reservations about one starting city, but they can redeem themselves if player actions once you leave the city really determine your place in the world (and there's actually consequences for actions).While personally I hate that Innoruuk was discarded(as well as quite a few others), I just don't understand the need for it. There is no good reason to fuck with the lore this much unless they are lazy or just trying to make a quick buck. I'd rather DEs be a later entry race 6 months down the road than to be a starting shit race. Why couldn't the DEs have been stolen by Innoruuk while they were trying to save the other elves?
While I sorta understand this position on the other hand, how many of these people who gives a shit still puts money in Sony's pocket as far as EQ is concerned? The masses deserted their posts many years ago, so regardless of how I feel or anyone else does in this paticular matter Sony owes no one a damn thing when creating EQN.yes! let's make a new everquest game and completely alienate everyone who actually remembers and gives a shit about the IP! what a great business decision by sony! anyone who defends this level of retardation should kill themselves.
I don't mind some changes to the lore it's the fact there are so many of them that's the problem. Nothing wrong with a little simplification but this is a little crazy.yes! let's make a new everquest game and completely alienate everyone who actually remembers and gives a shit about the IP! what a great business decision by sony! anyone who defends this level of retardation should kill themselves.
I can understand the removal of Innoruuk. I mean, how do you make the god of hate more neutral? He even hated his own creations! In the new pantheon they've created, Innoruuk just doesn't work. He wouldn't work as the god of death either, since he's basically the guy who runs around screaming "FUCK YOU!". In the original lore he only made the dark elves and trolls because he wasn't invited to Norrath by the other gods to create a race. So he corrupted what other gods created as a big "FUCK YOU" to them.That said, from a personal and nostalgic viewpoint, it really fucking blows to see the most iconic gods disappear (I would consider Bristlebane and Innoruuk among them). I don't see why Innoruuk couldn't be the god of Death (instead of Anashti) and Bristlebane the god of Thieves (instead of Talyn?).
do you understand that there are literally tens of thousands (if not more) of players out there who played the original EQ and have been waiting for this game for years? they should be catering to players like us because we're the ones who played everquest for 5 or more years and aren't going to be the masses of modern day morons who will play the game for a month and then move on to the next shiny thing on the horizon. but hey, that formula of catering to the least common denominator has worked so well over the last decade, they should probably follow the same path!While I sorta understand this position on the other hand, how many of these people who gives a shit still puts money in Sony's pocket as far as EQ is concerned? The masses deserted their posts many years ago, so regardless of how I feel or anyone else does in this paticular matter Sony owes no one a damn thing when creating EQN.
Incorrect.do you understand that there are literally tens of thousands (if not more) players out there who played the original EQ and have been waiting for this game for years? they should be catering to players like us because we're the ones who played everquest for 5 or more years and aren't going to be the masses of modern day morons who will play the game for a month and then move on to the next shiny thing on the horizon. but hey, that formula of catering to the least common denominator has worked so well over the last decade, they should probably follow the same path!
Don't know if simplification is the right word for it; fewer gods, but evidently going for more fleshed-out personas for them, as well as the faiths around them. And looking at the timeline they were describing, it's looking more like a history based around the interaction of various factions who don't fall into simple categories of good and evil (well, except maybe the shissar), rather than 90% of the history being "...and then this new god appeared and did X (usually creating a race). Why? Because fuck you, he's a god."I don't mind some changes to the lore it's the fact there are so many of them that's the problem. Nothing wrong with a little simplification but this is a little crazy.
Nice but i'd have the first image be the DeLorean DMC-12 from Back to the Future. One car is neat and futuristic but the other one lets you go back in time. I know which one is worth more to meOld Pantheon:
![]()
New Pantheon:
![]()
That sounds like you were happy with a the demi-god Druzzil Ro fucking with the timeline and the gods, which resulted in the creation of the Everquest II timeline.Nice but i'd have the first image be the DeLorean DMC-12 from Back to the Future. One car is neat and futuristic but the other one lets you go back in time. I know which one is worth more to me![]()
Lol, nice comeback. I wasn't and the lore isn't a deal breaker for me but I don't find it to be a great idea either. I don't like guns and renaissance versions of my EQ either but maybe this thing will help make EQ3. As long as it's fun I will be playing it but I do think they are trying too hard to be the next 'big thing'. Honestly, since SB and Voxel Farm are subcontracted to help them make a large portion of the game, i'd like to see them show some competence themselves beyond 'we have LoL-MMO yeah!' Lore would have been a nice way to show this.That sounds like you were happy with a the demi-god Druzzil Ro fucking with the timeline and the gods, which resulted in the creation of the Everquest II timeline.
Heretic.
Heh, so much for that.Flipmode_sl said:It's already in friends and family alpha/beta. After SOE live, beta will begin early Aug/late Sept. they are trying to launch Nov/Dec. the latest this game will launch is Feb/March time frame. They are much farther along then they let on and that's part of their surprise.
It's more about whether or not the game is Everquest.In the end, I really don't think the lore is gonna have much bearing on whether or not this game is fun
The No True Scotsman fallacy strikes again.It's more about whether or not the game is Everquest.