I suggest if you play the souls games start with ds1 because ds3 is so much better than 1 it's almost laughable. They are very easy after elden ring though. I replayed all 7 games last year and dark souls games were by far the easiest. Demons souls has kind of a strange difficulty where all of it is in the levels and the bosses are jokes.
EQ = Everquest an (at the time) amazing MMORPG we played via dialup/DSL/ISDN/Cable modems , came out in 99 or so. It's the game that founded the guild Fires of Heaven and this website/forum. I believe it's still a thing that you can play. Not sure if you have to pay for it anymore or not. Back in the day, it was a subscription cost. A LOT of the people here , myself included, spent way too many hours playing it and killing our social live. When I finally made myself quit, I never went back. It's the one thing I can point to that I had addiction issues with.
I DNF'd Sekiro, tbh, because I could never get the Burning Bull miniboss about 1/2 through the game despite trying multiple times over the course of a few years. DS3 and BB are my favorite Fs games. But I've learned that their DLCs are just a little too hard for me. Only From Software DLC I played was DS3's. I didn't even both with the ER DLC bc I knew Malenia was so gosh darn hard, that playing bosses harder than her were a hard pass.
Oh my god. I just had a core memory unlocked of playing Everquest on my middle school computers back in like 1999.
Dark Souls don’t have a “save” button. It’s always saved. If you die, you just respawn to the last fire.
Burning bull is like 10% into the game.
DLC was meh. I didn't use a single item of gear from that xpac. It wasn't hard but colossally annoying to explore. They got of on their verticality which simply meant zone design in some areas was complete ass. Meanshile the exploring in the base game is what kept me playing it.
Tough to say how accurate that % is since the person has beaten it before, but point taken.
