Investing General Discussion

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,395
33,549
But it should probably be made clear, Robinhood is not a bank, we are using terms like checking/saving. It remains a broker and is regulated and controlled as such. It is certainly not unique in that regard and many brokerages offer similar services.

Your risk with Robinhood in the manner being discussed is no different than having your money at any brokerage. I have a significant amount of money at a brokerage far beyond SIPC limits. I'm comfortable doing that with Vanguard. In the case of Robinhood I would probably seek to keep it under $250,000, but more out of a fear of lack of customer support than I would "financial Loss"
 

Keystone

Lord Nagafen Raider
459
250
While I'm all aboard the 3% hype train and will likely open an account, there's an interesting debate going on on Reddit atm about this. Essentially sounds like the head of SIPC is saying this would not be covered under their insurance as it's intent is not a brokerage vehicle; and a bunch of people agreeing with sleeve's assesment about the actual guarantee of funds...basically should a huge financial meltdown happen if you're cash is FDIC'd you're fine, but if it's SIPC'd you could be screwed as the pool of insurance could deplete rather rapidly.

I've went from 100% aboard the hypetrain to being a gametime decision based on this so far, but I would assume it's something Robynhood will address prior to launch which will land me back on the hypetrain I'm sure.
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,395
33,549
I will certainly be reading the fine print if/when it launches, there are rules about what a broker can do with your idle money as far as risk taking, which plays into it's ability to qualify under SIPC. The link is rather light on details. Taking issue about the intent of the money is not something that worrisome from a risk standpoint. This is such a good deal that I think they realize this will become a gigantic pool of money quickly.

If they failed to talk to SIPC I think that is troubling, may not be nefarious but calls into question their due diligence.

..edit More potential problems. I don't use debit cards because I'm not an idiot, but the bank they partnered with seems inadequate for the scale of this offering. If the fed announces next week that they are backing off on next years rate increases I think this offer will quietly disappear or be altered.
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,802
Don't really understand the allure/risk. You can get 2.8% on a Certificate of Deposit right now with a 1 year term. If you plan on actually making any real interest on the RobinHood 3%, you're still going to need to maintain a significant balance, so don't see the term on a CD being an issue.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,395
33,549
Don't really understand the allure/risk. You can get 2.8% on a Certificate of Deposit right now with a 1 year term. If you plan on actually making any real interest on the RobinHood 3%, you're still going to need to maintain a significant balance, so don't see the term on a CD being an issue.

well 2.8 is not 3 and this was to pay daily with no minimum. So to answer you it's just more flexible. I primarily use <12mo. T-bills for short term cash, this just would have been less work, while reducing principal risk if I sell a bond prior to mat.

VMMXX is currently yielding 2.34% so has the easy in/out flexibility but giving up even more on yield. I've just been happy to finally make some return on cash, but that doesn't stop me from hoping we creep up higher than here and get back to a more long term neutral level. That just seems less likely in the last 30 days, we'll know a lot better next Wednesday.
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,395
33,549
Today's rate for anyone curious (Money market accounts tend to be around the 30-45day cost for money)
Capture - Copy.JPG
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,802
well 2.8 is not 3 and this was to pay daily with no minimum. So to answer you it's just more flexible. I primarily use <12mo. T-bills for short term cash, this just would have been less work, while reducing principal risk if I sell a bond prior to mat.

VMMXX is currently yielding 2.34% so has the easy in/out flexibility but giving up even more on yield. I've just been happy to finally make some return on cash, but that doesn't stop me from hoping we creep up higher than here and get back to a more long term neutral level. That just seems less likely in the last 30 days, we'll know a lot better next Wednesday.

Yeah I mean I get that the RobinHood setup is technically better/flexible, but only marginally so with the current downside being you just don't know how secure your money will be. If it turns out that your money is safe/insured, it's a no brainer. Absent that, I'd rather have the FDIC backing at 2.8% than SIPC backing at 3.0% at an untested firm.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

sleevedraw

Revolver Ocelot
<Bronze Donator>
1,782
5,998
I'm aware of that but I wouldnt call that BS, has their ever been a failure by SIPC in 50yrs to provide the protection it mandates? And to the degree our governmental protects the financial industry it's highly unlikely in the extreme rare event SIPC was improperly funded that the failure would fall to consumers without the Fed stepping covering it, then regulating and fining the shit out of the companies that caused the fault.

If you call that SIPC BS then you think any private insurance is BS. Your health coverage is BS, your life insurance is BS.

Yeah, fair enough, BS was a bit of a conflation. But caveat emptor, as you've said.
 

Keystone

Lord Nagafen Raider
459
250
Actually just saw my little local bank upped their "Kasasa Cash" checking account to 3.05%, only up to $10K but really don't want to keep much more than that in cash at any point anyway, feel like I'd rather just get in the market with the majority of funds above that amount.
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,395
33,549
I don't believe in making quick decisions on long term money, but I did make a move towards cash today on LT money. My gut tells me that this market cycle is still not over, but the technical's are looking quite bad, and I follow a discipline regardless of how it may feel in the moment. We need to recover 20 month moving avg soon to avoid this turning into something uglier than a deep correction. The outlook in late 15-2016 was also quite bad and we ended up rallying quite hard off the Feb'16 lows. Not telling people to panic, anyone who has seen me post here for years knows that's not something I would do, BUT if you have strong gains going back to the beginning of this bull market it may be prudent to start watching a little to see if you want to take some off to have cash to redeploy at better prices.

We sometimes wait years and years for those low PE opportunities, so maybe the better message given the average age person here is to get cash ready, even if you would rather leave current investments alone. (timing the market successfully has low probability of success) We may be seeing some good companies at prices that just recently seemed unreachable.
 

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
36,276
115,067
My guess is we bottom out at about 20-25% from the top (so in the 2200-2350 S&P 500 range), followed by a mild recession (Q4 2018 and Q1 2019).

2019 will end up being a 15%+ market year by December 2019. Granted, that's from the lows we're at right now.
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
6,395
33,549
Feel pretty much the same , I could see it stopping 2400~ and a recovery to 2800-2900 sometime in 2019.

The secular bull trend can stay intact all the way down to 2150-2200 so it is likely to be some scary moments but still keep the longer trends healthy. One day at a time, we aren’t going to adjust from 7yrs of super low rates without some pain along the way.
 

Pops

Avatar of War Slayer
8,136
21,317
Time to exit passive investing. Pray for a a rally and get the hell out. If history repeats it's self, it trades sides for years.
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
6,972
19,157
heh, John Bogle died on the 16th, didn't see a peep about it on the news.

John C. Bogle

I saw one story talking about how much of an asshole he was. Fuck them, the man revolutionized investing for the average person in the U.S. and has improved the lives of more people than just about anyone in modern history.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users