"Gold is money, everything else is credit" sounds profound, but it only holds if you assume gold has some special, near-mystical property that makes it the one true measuring stick across all eras, technologies, and institutional setups. And that assumption is… weird. Gold isn't magic. It's a scarce commodity that worked as monetary collateral under very specific historical constraints of slow communication, physical settlement, limited state capacity, and localized trade. Those constraints don't exist anymore.
Using gold as the benchmark to declare that stocks "lost money" over 25 years is basically saying - if an asset doesn't outperform my preferred monetary relic, it didn't create value. That's not an objective truth, that's a choice of numeraire. You could just as easily say stocks massively outperformed wheat, copper, or labor hours. Why is gold the one sacred reference point? It's like a bunch of people read The Creature from Jekyll Island, decided they'd seen through the matrix, and now treat gold as some kind of secular religion. I don't get it.