IT/Software career thread: Invert binary trees for dollars.

TJT

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
41,261
103,756
ToeMissile said:
It makes sense, they’re going to spend time on larger offenders first. I know we’ve been ramping up on ops functionality built in house. Around 18 months ago they went live with using ML to process images for damage inspection of equipment in the field. There’s been a general increase in getting our collective asses out of the 90s. 100 yr old companies few.
Click to expand...
Yeah, considering we have like 8000 data models processing many terabytes of data daily they were sick of my shit lol.
 
Deathwing

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,454
7,468
Perhaps I'm in the minority, but this kinda stuff is a huge pain in the ass.

Porting to GCC 14 - GNU Project

gcc.gnu.org gcc.gnu.org

I manage QA for a static analysis product, so we have a lot of real world code in our automated regression testing. A fair amount of them now fail to build with gcc 14.
 
Deathwing

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,454
7,468
Been batting around the idea of parallelizing our web crawler. The main thing that stops us(read: me, I'm the only engineer in QA) is that multiprocess or threads, it's not a simple task. I wonder if this bend thing would help.
 
Khane

Khane

Got something right about marriage
19,965
13,516
What is going on now is the same thing that happened with things like Waterfall. Bloat, and the methodology being commandeered and bogged down by bureaucracy.

Waterfall and Agile aren't even that different, but new methodologies with none of that bloat come into the picture, gain traction, become bloated, and go away. Rinse repeat.

This will keep happening for as long as corporate "leaders" try to pad their resumes with "innovation" and ignore the major function for SDLC these methodologies are supposed to serve, in favor of using it to spy on and audit their teams.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
Palum

Palum

what Suineg set it to
23,808
34,704
Khane said:
What is going on now is the same thing that happened with things like Waterfall. Bloat, and the methodology being commandeered and bogged down by bureaucracy.

Waterfall and Agile aren't even that different, but new methodologies with none of that bloat come into the picture, gain traction, become bloated, and go away. Rinse repeat.

This will keep happening for as long as corporate "leaders" try to pad their resumes with "innovation" and ignore the major function for SDLC these methodologies are supposed to serve, in favor of using it to spy on and audit their teams.
Click to expand...
Yes but waterfall can just be bloated, costly and slow, agile doesn't work at all when it breaks down.
 
TJT

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
41,261
103,756
Agile is prone to breaking down much faster than waterfall is due to the above.

Knowing all the requirements before you start coding? That's the kind of thing I jack off thinking about.
 
  • 2Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 2 users
You must log in or register to reply here.