How do you jump from me saying that homosexuality is not just a genome driven phenomena to homophobia?
You just proved my point that this idea is pure politically correct bullshit.
Some gays are born that way, others weren't, but they were predisposed and environmental and cultural influences helped impact their decision to become homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that statement. In fact, saying that homosexuality is a purely genome driven process basically justifies viewing homosexuality as abberrant behavior from a genetic point of view.
Let's put this another way, you have an embryo with the "Gay gene". From your perspective, this can only be viewed as an abberration, such as trisomy events. And thus, "Repairing" the gay gene would be a perfectly acceptable medical technique. Now gay people are literally discriminated against in the womb and are being selected against.
Or, you know, we just accept that some people choose to be gay, and realize that people have a right to choose how their life's course will play out, and then we choose to respect their decision as an adult making choices for their lives that they perceive to be correct.
Somehow, all this is said to you, and you read "GAYS ARE BAD HERP A DERP"
I'm not trolling you Duppin, I'm teaching you science.
The problem with "people are born gay" is that it is a sleight-of-hand maneuver to equate gay politics to racial politics. After all, you're not a racist are you? How can you discriminate against people because they were born black? So how can you discriminate against people who are gay?
It was a useful argumentative sledgehammer (as faulty as it is) in the 1960s sexual revolution and post-Stonewall Riots, but knowing what we know these days about nature vs. nurture, it really doesnt pass the logical and scientific muster anymore.
Duppin, you're working from an old gay agenda playbook. Have someone over at the San Francisco Office of Homosexual Affairs send you an updated edition.