You are the only one talking about morals dude. You're arguing against yourself.
Their relationships aren't normal. That's the point. Should a 60 year old dude be making out with a 20 year old girl in front of my kids? How about a mistress and her slave on a dog leash in a latex suit being walked around in town square in front of my kids. Is that relationship normal?
We lock them up - law and order bro. Always have, always will. Do you even History, bro?
Where is your evidence that communism is currently the best societal system?
Considering half of our country doesn't even believe in evolution/science/biology, that's hardly an argument for the establishment of the thought police.
Why should they be respected? You still haven't given a justification for the ethical supremacy of majority opinion.
You haven't established that exposure to those things actually causes harm.
Err I should have said before they commit any acts that harm others. Seems the way Mik thinks it would be okay to lock them up before the fact if it could be shown such a defect would most likely result in the person committing a violent actm
Here, let me try this stupid type of argumentation as well.
Either make a fully formed argument or give up. I won't play this half assed socratic method game
Freedom and the Bill of Rights. I'm shocked that an american citizen would say something like that.
That's a (really) long side argument about the exploitative nature of capital relations. I'm happy to have it, but it'll totally shit all over this censorship debate and I really like that it's happening. Make a new thread for it in the shaw or wait later and ask me again.
Today more than ever you have the most options for deciding which media is hitting your brain. It's abundance hasn't created a paucity of choice. It's exactly the opposite.
let's compare scientific support with moral/normality of the society. That will work well.
Because the wishes of the 10% in question are that their right to free speech not be abridged without sufficient justification?
What constitutional rights would be denied by current decency laws?Freedom and the Bill of Rights. I'm shocked that an american citizen would say something like that.
Gay sex isn't abnormal or "against nature". Why do you turn into sounding exactly like a religious freak about this issue? Let gay people live how they want, show movies that they like, etc. It doesn't hurt you at all.