Wow, i'm an extremist because i think fining a morning news show for doing a friggin Miley Cyrus story is completely pants on the head retarded? Right. I'm not the one that needs a little perspective in this argument. But carry on high-fiving each other as if you've won some great battle in keeping society safe for the children.
You are extremely naive to think everyone has the right to do as they want. Some people are unable to properly function in society without guidance.
Because those "whims" are that the right of that 10% to say what they want not be infringed.
Why? What about them being a minority means they should have to respect those wishes?
According to you. Why should you be in charge? Because most people agree with you? Again, what about that condition carries ethical (rather than merely political) weight?
Who the fuck is making that argument?
No I did not mean it because of that. Like I said I agree with you with your views on religion, but to not to call them extremists would be dishonest, just like you saying that any censorship is harmful.
Iknoweveryone has the right to do as they want so long as it doesn't harm others (and there's a burden of proof there, since you're proposing to infringe on that right). It has nothing to do with functioning in society. It's a matter of basic moral principles. People are free until someone stops them and they better have a good goddamn reason for doing so.
Nobody is denying them that right. They are being asked not to say it in a commonly shared space with the other 90% because we dont give a fuck about their opinion and we dont want to hear it. They can still say it all they want amongst themselves and to anyone who wants to listen. We have already made the determination that we DONT want to hear it.
Please dont get into this stupid multi-quote half-assed socratic method that you employ against all these tards here. This isn't my first time in the internet I have no interest in diluting the cogency of my argument by splitting it up into 20 soundbites. Either formulate a response of a normal human being or admit that I am correct.
Sorry bro, infracted people cant see attachments. Hot link that shitCommunity standards. What could ever go wrong there?
It's illusory to think one can keep information from children for long is what I'm saying. We're not raising sleeping beauty here. Kids have internet and access to mass media, and generally are exposed to much more than we were as kids. I'd say it's smart to prepare them for the world, teach them how to navigate the sea of information, not try to hide it or put it off till we as parents are comfortable with it. To me it's about answering my kids truthfully when they have questions - layered with regard to complexity, sure, but never lies or half truths, and especially not fairytales masked as truths. I'm not giving the activist any power here, nor is he taking any from me or my child. Empower children instead of shielding them - the cost-benefit is rather obvious to me. Children mimic us. If we're awkward about sexuality, they will be too. I prefer to save money on their psychology bill even if it should cost me a moment of embarrassment.
Confirmed gaylid wants to wake up and watch two dudes butt pounding each other on prime time tv.Gotta love how when debating a law that is aimed at mainstream portrayals of homosexual relationships, Araysar keeps mentioning gay porn in primetime.
He really is scared of gay people.
Not that ANY censorship is harmful. Of course you as a parent censoring what your child is exposed to is a good thing. But the Government censoring the media and deciding what we can and can't watch is a bad thing. I honestly don't see how that's even in argument in this day and age. McCarthyism and the Red Scare....bad. The Catholic Church vs. Science....bad. Local libraries burning copies of Fahrenhiet 451...bad. Turning a nip slip during the Super Bowl halftime show into a national crisis....ridiculously bad.
Who am I to say that freedom is the default and that deviations from that require justification? Uh...someone whoisn'ta fascist sack of shit?
It was that pic of the old racists in the 50's protesting race mixing. You've seen it a million times.
