Mikhail and Hodj's Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Also how would an economic system like that survive the moment it needed raw materials or other goods not available to them on their land?

Hey China, have 10 goats, can I have some rare earth minerals please?
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
A system like that places greater burden and risk on outside players to a point where it would not he worth the rism to trade with them.

Ya in 1918 it may have been possible to have a the raw materials you need, but with modern extraction and mnnufacturing it wouldn't.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
The Ukrainian Free Territory probably isn't a good example as it was allied with former tsarists aka the bourgeousie to fight against Bolsheviks and the Red Army.

As a matter of fact, it seems like it was just loose organization of settlements, operating in some sort of quasi-anarchy

I have a feeling its the same with the Catalonia example.
Some hybrid anarchist-communist state seems to be Mik's utopia it seems.

For the ones of us who live in reality and interact in society, we recognize that would be an utter failure that would ultimately result in horror me human suffering.
 

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,228
172,459
UFT probably didnt even think of themselves as communists, they were just people going through a really tough time economically and were stuck in the middle of tsarists fighting the bolsheviks. They were probably suffering tremendously like most of Russia at that time, and that "communism" was probably just a desperate attempt by people with very little to cooperate to just feed themselves.

It might have functioned as some sort of communal communist anarchy, but I doubt it was prosperous at all, people were probably living hand to mouth.
 
2,199
1
How can you say that?
Because I've actually done my homework and I know that they were crushed militarily as a result?

It lasted for 3 years.
Right. But not for the reasons you're implying.

How is their economy better than a capitalistic one?
That depends on what your metric of "better" is. If you're talking about justice, it's not even a discussion. If you're talking about raw output, Catalonia did considerably better than the rest of Spain.

How is currency which a common denominator allowing you to convert between anything worse?
I'm assuming here you're again referring to Catalonia. Socialism doesn't require the abolition of currency and really if you look at the system they had in place, they didn't really abolish it there either. In general I think any modern economy would be untenable without currency.
 
2,199
1
A system like that places greater burden and risk on outside players to a point where it would not he worth the rism to trade with them.

Ya in 1918 it may have been possible to have a the raw materials you need, but with modern extraction and mnnufacturing it wouldn't.
What the hell are you talking about?
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
My "it lasted for 3 years" is referring to it as not being a good example. That is not nearly long enough for that experiment to run to see if their economy and society was truly possible.

The fact that the red army pushed their shit in doesn't matter to that point.
 
2,199
1
UFT probably didnt even think of themselves as communists, they were just people going through a really tough time economically and were stuck in the middle of tsarists fighting the bolsheviks. They were probably suffering tremendously like most of Russia at that time, and that "communism" was probably just a desperate attempt by people with very little to cooperate to just feed themselves.
Then why not simply join the Bolsheviks?
 
2,199
1
My "it lasted for 3 years" is referring to it as not being a good example. That is not nearly long enough for that experiment to run to see if their economy and society was truly possible.
These weren't exactly good years. To survive three winters under what were essentially wartime AND depression level stresses while implementing a radically new economic system (and increasing output) that covered literally millions of people isn't the nothing that you're insinuating.

The fact that the red army pushed their shit in doesn't matter to that point.
It absolutely matters for your idiotic assertion that it's a system doomed to failure. The fact that it made it "only" three years doesn't tell you that if the reason it "only" made it three years was that it was crushed militarily.
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
It only lasting 3 years means it isn't a good example of communism working because that isn't nearly long enough for a societal experiment to run.

God damn that's like throwing bleach on cancer cells and stating bleach cures cancer but never doing the same test on healthy cells.
 
2,199
1
It only lasting 3 years means it isn't a good example of communism working because that isn't nearly long enough for a societal experiment to run.
There's no such thing as a "societal experiment." That is not a thing. Even if it had lasted 30 years, you'd just be pointing to how they were agricultural societies and today we live in an information economy. The only burden I have to show is that it's feasible (these examples do show that) and that it's ethically superior (which is an argument you haven't even broached but of course you wouldn't because that's just some of that lame ass philosophy bullshit and they don't talk about that on the TEE-vee.

God damn that's like throwing bleach on cancer cells and stating bleach cures cancer but never doing the same test on healthy cells.[/QUOTE]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.