Mikhail and Hodj's Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Izo

Tranny Chaser
20,146
25,336
mortalkombat_univers.jpg
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Hey Dumar, a 12 year old boy that's in the same team at my daughter's school apparently killed himself yesterday.

Care to fill us in on how proud his lesbian mother should be for him rejecting having to live in a society that forces him to be subjected to manufactured experiences constantly?
 
2,199
1
Even better, this will be a Three Way Death Match
No I'm not interested in trying to argue with intellectually dishonest people anymore. After tonight, hodj will be free to continue blathering about things he doesn't understand without rejoinder. I'm sure he'll declare victory (again) and you'll be right there to slurp up after he's done.
 

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,164
172,397
Bro, are you really gonna give up after 5 hours? You're so close to winning, especially with Dumar helping out
 
2,199
1
Bro, are you really gonna give up after 5 hours? You're so close to winning, especially with Dumar helping out
There is no winning with someone who will say literally anything. That is a false proposition. And you? You're still mad about yesterday, so you'll just use this as an opportunity to troll the shit out of me because you don't actually have any real interest in the debate.
 

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,164
172,397
There is no winning with someone who will say literally anything. That is a false proposition. And you? You're still mad about yesterday, so you'll just use this as an opportunity to troll the shit out of me because you don't actually have any real interest in the debate.
How can I be mad when I handily crushed all of you and exposed all of you as all-or-nothing extremists?
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Anyone find it ironic that he's literally claimed that every major communist revolution wasn't really communist on the one hand, then on the other accusing me of being willing to say "anything" to win, or whatever?

Projection Mikhail. Google the definition.
 
2,199
1
Anyone find it ironic that he's literally claimed that every major communist revolution wasn't really communist on the one hand, then on the other accusing me of being willing to say "anything" to win, or whatever?
Except that I've given my reasons and you have no response other than your asinine incredulity. But here's the thing: I don't give a shit about your incredulity because I'm much MUCH smarter than you. A reaction of "pfffft" from morons doesn't actually mean anything.
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
All you have to do to own hodj up Bret Hart-style with this topic is mention all the names of leading academics in his own and related fields, like David Harvey. He'll paint you a religious radical, readily admit many in his field are hard Marxists, then tell you to ignore a book he's never read.

His is a cursory but very common misunderstanding of Marx, which is totally understandable - most people barely even know the subject to begin with, let alone read it. But you can't pass off cursory for complete knowledge or real experience.

And now we'll get that a survey of the material is just as good as reading the material itself in 3,2,1.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Except that I've given my reasons and you have no response other than your asinine incredulity. But here's the thing: I don't give a shit about your incredulity because I'm much MUCH smarter than you. A reaction of "pfffft" from morons doesn't actually mean anything.
Your reasons were shown to be appeals to fallacy logic. Sorry bro. You lost.
 
2,199
1
All you have to do to own hodj up Bret Hart-style with this topic is mention all the names of leading academics in his own and related fields, like David Harvey. He'll paint you a religious radical, readily admit many in his field are hard Marxists, then tell you to ignore a book he's never read.

His is a cursory but very common misunderstanding of Marx, which is totally understandable - most people barely even know the subject to begin with, let alone read it. But you can't pass off cursory for complete knowledge or real experience.

And now we'll get that a survey of the material is just as good as reading the material itself in 3,2,1.
lol
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
All you have to do to own hodj up Bret Hart-style with this topic is mention all the names of leading academics in his own and related fields, like David Harvey. He'll paint you a religious radical, readily admit many in his field are hard Marxists, then tell you to ignore a book he's never read.

His is a cursory but very common misunderstanding of Marx, which is totally understandable - most people barely even know the subject to begin with, let alone read it. But you can't pass off cursory for complete knowledge or real experience.

And now we'll get that a survey of the material is just as good as reading the material itself in 3,2,1.
Mikhail says that you must take history into context for socialism to work.

You say that history doesn't matter.

Even the two die hard communists can't agree and have misunderstanding about Marxism.

What you're pointing to is yet more evidence of the flaws in your ideology, and nothing more.

Hell, you faggots can't even agree on whether every major communist revolution in history was actually communism, or double top secret decoder ring capitalism lying about its intentions to fool the masses into falling into line behind the new elite.

Let me know when you guys agree on which revolutions were "Real" communism and which weren't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.