Gravel
Mr. Poopybutthole
Now that's what I call quality gaming!my path to 50 took considerably longer since I played a rogue and spent probably 75% of my time online LFG.
- 1
Now that's what I call quality gaming!my path to 50 took considerably longer since I played a rogue and spent probably 75% of my time online LFG.
Brain damage confirmed.MnM, if you can't deliver a similar experience to a Troll SK in 1999 ON A PVP SERVER WITH ITEM LOOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! then I can't support.
You're just garbage at remembering and think that your time on TLP's and emulators is indicative of the EQ experience from 26 years ago.
I was likely killing AoW while you were still doing your first Nagafen raid.
In my time playing EQ. Sol b was always full and you had wait lists for each camp. People would spend all day in there grinding, 10+ hours, then camp out at the zone to do it all over again for weeks or more. I can't remember the exact time per level, since it was 25 years ago. But it was painful and the zone was almost always full.If low 40s took you 8 hours of pure grinding per level in Guk, again, you were garbage at EQ. There were single play sessions where I’d grind out an entire level at Frenzy, and i wasn’t playing anywhere near 8h in a row. Maybe you were alt-tabbed playing Commander Keen as well? The only way i could see this is if you were on a very high pop server and Guk was so packed there was significant spawn competition… which did happen.
In my time playing EQ. Sol b was always full and you had wait lists for each camp. People would spend all day in there grinding, 10+ hours, then camp out at the zone to do it all over again for weeks or more. I can't remember the exact time per level, since it was 25 years ago. But it was painful and the zone was almost always full.
I doubt anything like that would be possible today or that people would want something like that, but its what we had so we made the best of it.
I didn’t mean it as an insult when I said I don’t have to pay attention playing this game. Again I’m probably biased because I have a group I’ve been gaming with for over 20 years so when we decide to play a game together we always know there will be someone to group with, lfg or soloing is hardly anything I need to worry about. But sometimes I like having a game that’s more like a screensaver how eq was for me, than a balls to the wall sweatfest where I get angry and break controllers (a la from software games).
if you are looking for tense , engaging content I don’t see how this is the game for you. They’d have to make it significantly harder
I get the appeal of wanting a slower, more relaxed game. Sometimes I want that too. Not everything has to be a high-stakes sweatfest. But here's the thing: if the whole design boils down to minimal inputs and low engagement, why not just lean into that fully and make it an idle RPG or auto-battler? At least then it's honest about what kind of experience it's offering.I didn’t mean it as an insult when I said I don’t have to pay attention playing this game. Again I’m probably biased because I have a group I’ve been gaming with for over 20 years so when we decide to play a game together we always know there will be someone to group with, lfg or soloing is hardly anything I need to worry about. But sometimes I like having a game that’s more like a screensaver how eq was for me, than a balls to the wall sweatfest where I get angry and break controllers (a la from software games).
if you are looking for tense , engaging content I don’t see how this is the game for you. They’d have to make it significantly harder
I'm not. The EQ gameplay loop was dogshit for the most part. The game had tons of broken quests and other shit. The only thing that kept me going was the people that I played with. Shortly after Kunark came out most of my friends were done with EQ and we moved onto Eq2. We poopsocked to max level firsts in our classes, then moved onto WoW. WoW was definitely the better game, by far. Early WoW was full of people just like early EQ, before all the group finder stuff, people did socialize in WoW, just like in EQ.What people are describing taps into something innate in humans. We romanticize the past not because the systems were inherently good, but because our brains are wired to associate novelty, youth, and community with meaning. Psychology circles call this "rosy retrospection": the tendency to remember past experiences as being better than they actually were.
I dunno, maybe I'm just a masochist but I still occasionally log a few hundred hours here & there camping clickies in EQ - that I'll only ever use the next time I log in to camp clickies.What people are describing taps into something innate in humans. We romanticize the past not because the systems were inherently good, but because our brains are wired to associate novelty, youth, and community with meaning. Psychology circles call this "rosy retrospection": the tendency to remember past experiences as being better than they actually were.
When you think back to LGuk waitlists or being spammed with tells as a cleric, what your brain is really recalling isn't "great gameplay loops." It's the feeling of being valued, being young and available, and being immersed in a new, exciting space that few people had experienced before. The downtime and clunky mechanics didn't create joy, they simply provided the empty space where social bonds could fill in. With enough time, our minds smooth over the boredom and frustration and leave behind only the highlight reel of "tight-knit community."
But here's the catch: those factors can't be recreated in 2025. We're older. Time is scarce. The MMO market is crowded. People don't sit in waitlists for 6 hours anymore. And not because they hate community, but because there are a thousand better uses of their time and a thousand other options/platforms to socialize in. Trying to recreate that era by reintroducing the same punishing mechanics is chasing a psychological mirage.
The truth is, those mechanics weren't good then and they aren't good now. They just happened to align with the social and psychological conditions of that moment in gaming history. It's why devs keep failing to recreate that "magic" over and over and people bust out "NO TRUE SCOTSMAN!!" fallacies repeatedly. What players miss is how they felt back then, not the systems themselves. And that's the critical distinction - because designing around nostalgia is designing for a memory, not for reality.
Eh 120k a month is plenty to run the game and even work part-time. It really depends on their direction. You want to equate this to either having 250K+ subs or being a flop. That's not true. Something small can work quite well if the team delivers, and so far they are. Whether or not that is what you want or I want is another matter. I think despite the odds, they are doing fine. EA will tell all. Can they get 8-10K EA subs and keep them? Can they grow that over time? Can they improve upon systems for 1.0 (which is probably 2 years away at least). If they have a timeline of 2-3 years for full release then they have a shot. Certainly better than Pantheon at this point in time and whatever that god forsaken AoC game is.Let’s be real: even if they somehow hit 8,000 subs and not the 2-5k like you're suggesting, that’s $120k/month. This is 2025. Servers, legal, customer support, marketing, taxes, none of that is free. A "passion project" doesn't magically turn into a sustainable MMO business.
Saying "we're just a small team" doesn’t erase the math. Nostalgia and love for the craft aren't currency. You can't live off warm fuzzies, and the harsh truth is that unless they massively scale or start cutting corners, this "niche dream" is financially doomed. Small teams running a live MMO in the modern world? That's a bet that's already stacked against them before day one. There's a reason this genre is dying. They are expensive as hell to make and expensive as hell to keep running.
The more you analyze this whole thing, the more it starts to feel like these guys are the epitome of "vibe coding."
They did a survey in their discord and the largest demographic of people were 35-44, 25-34 was the second largest.I'd actually be curious to see an age demographic. Old EQ boomers are always bemoaning lack of free time for these kind of games but there's other generations after us. I'm pretty sure they can capture some players younger than 50.
You must have been on a time locked server, because EQ was well past Kunark when it came out.I'm not. The EQ gameplay loop was dogshit for the most part. The game had tons of broken quests and other shit. The only thing that kept me going was the people that I played with. Shortly after Kunark came out most of my friends were done with EQ and we moved onto Eq2. We poopsocked to max level firsts in our classes, then moved onto WoW. WoW was definitely the better game, by far. Early WoW was full of people just like early EQ, before all the group finder stuff, people did socialize in WoW, just like in EQ.
I wasn't trying to say that we moved directly to EQ2 after stopping EQ. Just that we played EQ2 when it came out, then move onto WoW. We also played Anarchy Online, Star Wars Galaxies, and other mmos for awhile. But the best of them was WoW for sure.You must have been on a time locked server, because EQ was well past Kunark when it came out.
If I remember correctly, it was on to Omens of War before WoW and EQ2 released. That would mean you missed Velious, Luclin, PoP and GoD.