Gavinmad
Mr. Poopybutthole
Lower burden of proof in civil court is why it's a slam dunk. Just like oj.
No. In fact I don't think you could possibly be more wrong.
Lower burden of proof in civil court is why it's a slam dunk. Just like oj.
No. In fact I don't think you could possibly be more wrong.
Useful explanation for your take.
Preponderance of evidence is lower.
Technically he is innocent and that verdict is vacated. There is no slam dunk.
Just wondering if in Gillette Stadium, any awards area or wall of fame section (or something similar) still listed Aaron Hernandez as part of a winning Super Bowl team or was his name stricken from record similar to how the WWF removed all mention of Chris Benoit after that tragedy? I remember the Patriots dropping him after his arrest many years back, but did they go all out and banish his name from record?
Don't know why this thought came to mind just now.
The fact that he was, in effect, not found guilty in a criminal trial will have no effect on a civil trial
Just wondering if in Gillette Stadium, any awards area or wall of fame section (or something similar) still listed Aaron Hernandez as part of a winning Super Bowl team or was his name stricken from record similar to how the WWF removed all mention of Chris Benoit after that tragedy? I remember the Patriots dropping him after his arrest many years back, but did they go all out and banish his name from record?
Don't know why this thought came to mind just now.
A conviction in a criminal trial is admissible as evidence in a civil trial, so yeah having his criminal conviction vacated would theoretically be a pretty huge deal in civil court.
I mean he'll undoubtedly still lose in civil court even without a criminal conviction for the complaint, but I doubt his estate has anything left anyway.
Broncos schedule is interesting. And apparently the number one in SoS.
SoS is meaningless from 1 season to the next.
Right, but they can't say he was found not guilty in the criminal trial like Uber was alluding to.