No, but you can make them serve the same sentence.Well yeah, but thats like charging someone with murder, and attempted murder. You cant charge someone with murder if no one was killed.
Tell me more about the definition of "possession" and grace periods.lol. GG. Get owned more.
I feel like Zdeno Chara when you try to start an argument about hockey with meAlready told you using examples from the NHL rule book, and you cant understand so I got you this.
![]()
Yeah because Shannahan didn't explain all of that in that video of why Seabrook was suspended.By my logic, neither Seabrook nor Orpik should be suspended.
Your "logic" involves thought crime aka unprovable intent, severity of injury which can very greatly even though the action creating them is identical, puck distances from players, grace periods, being "unsuspecting" and many more instances of hilarious shit that you just make up as your "argument" continues to get demolished. Did you just start following hockey recently? What's your deal?