Clean? What a joke. Backes didnt have the puck, was unsuspecting and defenseless, leaves his feet, and injures a player. Should have been more than 3 games.why? he doesnt check him in the back and he doesnt leave the ice. its a clean hard check.
Didnt leave feet, got checked in the front. The only argument you can make is that he didnt have the puck for 2-3 seconds before Seabrook laid him out, but Seabrook might not have known thatOn the Backes hit, it was clearly a bad one, but is there any slow-mo shot that shows him actually leaving his feet? Remember if you don't leave your feet before contact it's not leaving your feet according to the rules.
I'll agree with whatever you want on this dirty hit as long as you'll admit Duncan Keith is a piece of shit.Didnt leave feet, got checked in the front. The only argument you can make is that he didnt have the puck for 2-3 seconds before Seabrook laid him out, but Seabrook might not have known that
Didnt leave feet, got checked in the front. The only argument you can make is that he didnt have the puck for 2-3 seconds before Seabrook laid him out, but Seabrook might not have known thatOn the Backes hit, it was clearly a bad one, but is there any slow-mo shot that shows him actually leaving his feet? Remember if you don't leave your feet before contact it's not leaving your feet according to the rules.
But the only reason it was sort of from the front was because Backes turned at the last second. The intent was there. Also the principal point of contact was the head.Didnt leave feet, got checked in the front. The only argument you can make is that he didnt have the puck for 2-3 seconds before Seabrook laid him out, but Seabrook might not have known that
What intent? Maybe Seabrook was expecting Backes to turn towards him.But the only reason it was sort of from the front was because Backes turned at the last second. The intent was there. Also the principal point of contact was the head.
I just point out the "left his feet" part because of so many mouth-breather Pens fans over the years that have claimed that after every Ovechkin hit where his feet weren't leaving the ice until after contact with the other player.
Brosar, you know they consider intent with regards to suspensions. Come on man, at least pretend like you follow hockey a little.What intent? Maybe Seabrook was expecting Backes to turn towards him.
I mean do you really want to start suspending players for "intent"?
As far as the check to the head, its a minor penalty. Not even a major or a game misconduct.
Speaking of Pens, how many games was Brooks Orpik was suspended for when he put the exact same hit on Jonathan Toews earlier this season?
He gave up two early goals that he should of controlled better but he seems to of tightened up since. It's mostly the Pens D shitting the bed, giving up the puck left and right. Gotta give credit to CBJ shutting down Sid and Malkin and Bobro, the fucker, is in top form.The heck is going on in Columbus? Is it Fleury just shitting the bed, or is it a whole team effort? I virtually always cheer for the underdog, so if the Blue Jackets can eliminate the Penguins, I'm all for it.
Youre a fucking tool. Intent? How bout the intent were Seabrook didnt for one millisecond even look at the puck and try and play it? Backes had his back turned and there was no intent on playing the puck at all.What intent? Maybe Seabrook was expecting Backes to turn towards him.
I mean do you really want to start suspending players for "intent"?
As far as the check to the head, its a minor penalty. Not even a major or a game misconduct.
Speaking of Pens, how many games was Brooks Orpik was suspended for when he put the exact same hit on Jonathan Toews earlier this season?