- 2,114
- 536
When is property destruction warranted or in self-defense?
I'm bound by forum rules not to encourage unlawful activity.
- 2
- 1
When is property destruction warranted or in self-defense?
McCain and Lindsey grahm are trumps biggest gop political opponents because they are both unrepentant nato warmongers.
grahmn ran for president this year on the promise to start multiple wars including with Iran.
Mccain has been pictured with every militant group on every frontier taunting and promoting military build up, including within only a couple hundred miles from moscow.
Ask yourself why the two biggest war hawks in the last 30 years are your sudden allies?
War is an insane polluter of the environment scratch, extremely toxic.
Ok I will ask. Self told me it's because they are speaking the truth. They are also calling for sanctions not war.
This is fine. Once we have the Trump/Russia alliance we will have forces and a base close enough for the USAR alliance for China wargame drills. MAGA!"Only sanctions"
McCain: Permanent US troops in Estonia, rather than rotation
Estonia is 600 miles from moscow.
I hate to say it but Sam has bought into a lot of the Dem/Russia talking points. I'm beginning to think his extreme personal distaste for Trump is starting to fog over his usual intellectual clarity. He needs to take a breather on politics and re-focus on religion.
Oh also nearly every US cybersecurity expert "talking point". It's also I guess a "talking point" of the encyclopedia.
The U.S. Intelligence Community affirmed its confidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 United States elections in an October letter of that year.[1] The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), representing 17 intelligence agencies and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly stated that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and leaked its documents to WikiLeaks.[2][3][4] Russia said it had no involvement.[5] President Barack Obama used the red phone line to directly contact Vladimir Putin and emphasize the importance of the cyber attacks.[6] Intelligence agencies said they had high confidence that Russia acted to favour the election of Donald Trump.[7][8] Post-election information led to "a high level of confidence" that Putin "personally directed" the operation.[9][10][11] Russia disputed Putin's involvement.[11] CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and DNI James Clapper agreed on the "scope, nature and intent" of Russia's interference to assist Trump.[12][13][14] Cybersecurity firms, including: CrowdStrike, Fidelis Cybersecurity, Mandiant, SecureWorks, and ThreatConnect, stated that the cyberattacks were committed by Russian intelligence groups Fancy Bear and Cozy Bear.