Completely depends on their contract, they could get a flat fee, they could get $1 every time it's streamed, they could get a % of gross/net/profit...Don't they get royalties? Or maybe that was the pre-streaming world.
This is exactly what I was thinking/hoping might've been the case here since they managed to film this with such an absurdly low budget.Completely depends on their contract, they could get a flat fee, they could get $1 every time it's streamed, they could get a % of gross/net/profit...
Studios usually try to do the % of profit/net thing when they can't pay upfront and they want to shift the risk to the actors/crew (bad risk and good risk). Sometimes it works out for the actors, sometimes not.
enter the dragon is wild though, i assume $400m is adjusted for inflation cuz otherwise it'd be bigger than like star wars
I was about to post the same thing 'cause it was the first thing I noticed, too. That would be wild if it's not adjusted.
How the hell did blair witch project have almost a million budget? I feel like 10,000$ would be grossly overstating their budget.
Marketing maybe? I remember going and seeing it in the theater back in the day, and at the time there were constant advertisements for it.How the hell did blair witch project have almost a million budget? I feel like 10,000$ would be grossly overstating their budget.
How the hell did blair witch project have almost a million budget? I feel like 10,000$ would be grossly overstating their budget.
And fuck them all to hell for introducing that nauseating shaky cam bullshit/65k production budget. Rest was marketing from Artisan and they made every dollar count. I know people believed that shit was real based on trailers. They had a internet tie ins in 1999, they actors literally stayed out of the public and IMDB had them listed as missing presumed dead. Its probably the best movie marketing job of all time