Guess it's cool to hate on the movie because it doesn't adhere to the standard narrative forms. Refn is a master of his craft, of that it would be hard to argue, even if you don't like the style of the story he told.
Some people need more defined characters and motives, and one true hero or antihero. I can understand that, and why you would dislike this movie. Some like coffee, some tea, etc.
Some say that's it's too artsy. I wouldn't even call it an 'artsy' film, it's just Refn's style to leave aspects of all his players on the stage open to interpretation, and let you form your own opinions without being hit over the head with a forced character archetype. It's just another form of narrative.
I enjoy the style and non-predefined characters a lot, and the Bangkok vibe is a plus for me as someone who likes certain Asian cultures, so I'm going to commit movie heresy and say I thought this movie was better than drive, and I noticed Refn improving as a director and coming into his own a bit more.
If nothing else you have to be excited for someone who doesn't play it safe in Cinema directing/storytelling, because it's become really formulistic/safe recently.
For those that say it's pretentious, I just don't understand in what context you're speaking. To me some lone mortal that saves the world with no shades of grey to his character is pretentious. THAT is what feels fake and showy, and full of itself.
8.5/10 - biggest knock was the jaw pulling scene for some obvious reasons, but for all most films get wrong it's hard to let one scene reflect too negatively on some great aspects of the movie for me.