Just because your aim is beyond abysmal doesn't mean someone with even mediocre aim can't exploit the characterThe people complaining about WM, I wonder if they've ever played a FPS game in the last 20 years. It's mind-boggling to me.
Just because your aim is beyond abysmal doesn't mean someone with even mediocre aim can't exploit the characterThe people complaining about WM, I wonder if they've ever played a FPS game in the last 20 years. It's mind-boggling to me.
A million times this. It's apples and oranges, she doesn't need to be gutted but TTK needs to be tuned.This WM vs AWP comparison is beyond bad. AWP is about making sure you hit the 1 shot you're given because you're scoped down a very narrow hallway or doorway slit. With WM you are pumping shots left and right because you have a 100 foot sight line onto the objective.
My aim doesn't matter - I play against plenty of widowmakersJust because your aim is beyond abysmal doesn't mean someone with even mediocre aim can't exploit the character
Hanzo has far more outplay capabilities than Widow for a variety of reasons. I don't disagree Hanzo rando headshots and scatters are frustrating but its not an apt comparison.I'm ok with a widowmaker fire time nerf or reduce the sub 100% charge damage. Because I agree, it's a bit frustrating when Im sniped by one who never fires a single full charge shot. What I also hate though is that no one is calling for the Hanzo nerf when his arrows can headshot people when they weren't even near the target's head AND the charge doesnt affect the damage, only the distance of the arrow.
Totally. Hanzo's kit isn't nearly as good as Widows. Hanzo's damage output is also really low. And he has to mostly be in midrange to do good work. Aside from the occasional BS scattershot that instantly kills you he's not really a problem. There's a reason he's at the bottom of the tier list. Sure, he can climb walls, but he has nowhere near the mobility of Widowmaker. Yes his arrow hit box is huge, but it sort of needs to be with it not being hitscan and it being an arched projectile. He'd be very boring to play for 90% of the playerbase if his arrow hitbox was super strict. 90% of people would never land shit. You don't see really good Hanzos singlehandedly deciding games unless your team is terrible. Whereas your team can be great and still get stomped against an amazing Widow unless you counter her with a better Widow. Once you get to level 50ish+ you don't think Hanzo is BS anymore. You go through an evolution. Which is what we've seen in the community where now people are finally coming to fact based conclusions about which heroes need work in either direction and why its pretty universally agreed upon by any experienced player that Widowmaker needs a nerf. Just as it's already been agreed and settled that McCree needs a nerf. Hanzo is fine.Hanzo has far more outplay capabilities than Widow for a variety of reasons. I don't disagree Hanzo rando headshots and scatters are frustrating but its not an apt comparison.
Two problems with that.. the headshot thing, that is the game. Hanzo isn't some special snowflake that benefits from extra large head boxes.. everyone does. The headshot hitboxes being larger, I think it's fine.. the game is comprised of mostly projectile based characters. If they were to 'remove' or 'fix' it, most all the projectile characters would be instantly outshined by characters who have instant attacks like that of Mcree, Tracer, Reaper, Widow, and 76.What I also hate though is that no one is calling for the Hanzo nerf when his arrows can headshot people when they weren't even near the target's head AND the charge doesnt affect the damage, only the distance of the arrow.
Regular FPS games don't have bullet damage falloff of twelve feet for every gun not used by widowmaker, so I can still dome your sniper ass just as easily when you play like shit.The people complaining about WM, I wonder if they've ever played a FPS game in the last 20 years. It's mind-boggling to me.
He does okay, but there is a lot of maps that Widow is for sure going to be able to land a few shot on him on the way in and then can mow him down with machine gun or just hook away. He is pretty good at disrupting her though. I've definitely turned games around by switching to him vs a Widow that is shutting us downwhy isn't Winston considered a good WM counter? I've only played pub solo games, so whenever I get sniped by a WM I switch to Winston and chase her like a pedo after a child star, the leaps and high HP pool make WMs a joke for Winston. 2-3 easy kills later and the WM switches to reaper or mcree. Only times I've ever had a problem killing WMs as a Winston is if she is with another DPS, but thats fairly rare in pub games.
Hanzo is just a shitty character that has no business in the game. He's not good, but they had to give him such ridiculous, hit half the screen every time you shoot, aim just to make him relevant and makes it makes it frustrating for anyone he kills. And they've backed themselves in a corner with him because they can't lessen his bullshit or he'd easily be the worst character in the game. So basically for anyone who hates Hanzo, just know that the reason he is so cheap is because that's the only way they could squeeze his stupid ass into the lineup. Basically, you are going to see him get ridiculous kills a lot and it's never going to change.Hanzo has far more outplay capabilities than Widow for a variety of reasons. I don't disagree Hanzo rando headshots and scatters are frustrating but its not an apt comparison.