You're assuming:
- They abandoned ABQ, rather than just pulling out a majority of its population
- They aren't literally following her around with a convoy of trucks with random shit she likes, all while the entire planet is basically starving to death. While basically doing something similar for 12 others for reasons unknown to the viewer.
- They aren't just using the solar/wind power generation in ABQ to just keep the lights on
View attachment 612167
You make a lot of assumptions, then get mad when those assumptions aren't true and say the show is dumb. The show has clearly stated the Plurbs will move heaven and earth for the immune, there's nothing they've shown that is inconsistent.
Might want to reread my posts since I explicitly stated I *didn't* want to get in the weeds on this and my problem with the show is not that they get all this stuff wrong (which they absolutely are getting it all wrong) it's that they bothered to get into the weeds trying to pseudo-explain it to begin with to then just ignore all the logical fallacies and contradictions that that creates.
I would be fine if the show was more vague, more mystery, and required you the viewer to make assumptions, which then turn out to be right or wrong, but that's not what the show is doing. The show is stating how it is, they are establishing rules, and then they are ignoring their own rules or the logical result of said rules for narrative reasons.
For the record, you clearly have no idea how electricity even works if you think "oh they just use solar" solves any of the problems of load balancing a cities worth of electrical generation on the whims of a single occupant. It requires maintenance, labor, and oversight of hundreds if not thousands of people to keep that cities energy grid running, and power isn't even the worst of it. Water would be the first system to collapse without people to maintain it out in the desert and all.
So no, i'm not making any assumptions. they stated and showed explicitly that they abandoned the city. Per the writers of the show, they abandoned the city to Carol. Now, anyone with 2 brain cells realizes this can't actually be true, there would have to be people to maintain the city or it would collapse, as well as people on hand to deliver her things. That is the assumption, a logical leap that you the viewer (who is not retarded) must make to explain away the plothole that the show's own narrative created. That's my problem, we have to make excuses because they are getting basic facts wrong.
I'll once again point to the wolves from episode 2, 3? First week since the conversion and they were scavenging trash and trying to dig up helen's corpse for food. This was a narrative choice, not a realistic, logical outcome. Wolves avoid people, especially with an entire city of cats and doodles and newly released and no longer protected live stock to feast upon, there is no way that the wolves just happen to intentionally go and attack the only person in the city who still has their fucking lights on at their house. That scene made no logical sense, It was simply foreshadowing that the hive was scavenging the dead and eating people.
So the wolves aren't actually scavenging, you just have to pretend that scene didn't actually happen *in the world* , it was a dream, just setup for an episode cliffhanger + later reveal. Because otherwise, where are the wolves now? They spent an entire episode following Carol as she went about her life *completely alone* in ABQ, the weeds are growing in the golf courses because no one is maintaining the lawns, bunny rabbits are just out and about living their best life. Buffalo are free grazing by hole 9. No fear of humans (they haven't seen any in weeks, Carol is the only person in the city) No wolves, no predators of any kind it seems. Those wolves were just a narrative device, they weren't real, the same way this entire episode pretty much confirms it with their "nature is healing" and society is falling apart without the Hive motiff.
Again they are showing us that the city is not being maintained at all by anyone, it's just Carol, she almost burns down her neighbor's house, her car breaks down and she abandons it for another vehicle because she doesn't know how to fix anything. she's bored as fuck just knocking out windows from office buildings with her golf clubs. It's full own urban decay, no one is helping her, they aren't hiding in the bushes coming out to save her or fix her mistakes, they aren't maintaining shit. That is what is being stated, conveyed, and symbolized. That is the show's narrative.
the problem is that obviously doesn't making any fucking sense, you just have to ignore it. Just like the food. They have, at most, by the shows own admission, 3 months of food. we've just time skipped to day 46 so less than half of that now. Will they address the fact that by week 10 about 7 billion of the 7.3 billion survivors will begin to starve to death? I mean once they have 7 billion more corpses the remaining population can survive a further 6 months with their magic powder drink being 95% HDP and 5% apples they found on the ground but by month 10 the only pockets of humanity will be small enclaves living in jungles with an abundant natural food sources that falls out of trees.
The answer, of course, is "don't think about" And my only problem with that is "Then why the fuck did you even bring it up, then?"
the show lacks internal consistency with the rules it establishes for itself. I had high hopes initially but they keep stepping on their dick. Earlier I dismissed the whole "Surprise, we could lie the entire time, we just chose to wait 3 seasons until this exact moment to reveal to you that we've been lying all this time, because we needed to in order to get out of this conundrum that the writers put us in" but I actually think that's back on the table.