Project Hail Mary

Guurn

<Bronze Donator>
7,322
36,669
"Science fiction (often shortened to sci-fi or SF) is a genre of speculative fiction that deals principally with the impact of actual or imagined science and technology upon society or individuals. Unlike fantasy, which relies on magic or the supernatural, science fiction grounds its imaginative elements in scientific principles, theories, and plausible extrapolations of current knowledge. "


So no, didn't make it up.
 

Quaid

Trump's Staff
12,694
7,405
"Science fiction (often shortened to sci-fi or SF) is a genre of speculative fiction that deals principally with the impact of actual or imagined science and technology upon society or individuals. Unlike fantasy, which relies on magic or the supernatural, science fiction grounds its imaginative elements in scientific principles, theories, and plausible extrapolations of current knowledge. "


So no, didn't make it up.

oh dear.

Cheers man
 

faille

Trakanon Raider
1,992
574
What you're talking about is more commonly called Hard Sci Fi.

I would say the Martian is more hard sci fi than Project Hail Mary.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

...

Goonsquad Officer
8,452
20,586
What you're talking about is more commonly called Hard Sci Fi.

I would say the Martian is more hard sci fi than Project Hail Mary.
Sorry bro, Martian made up big mars super hurricane winds. Space fantasy movie with thee!
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,549
20,440
"Science fiction (often shortened to sci-fi or SF) is a genre of speculative fiction that deals principally with the impact of actual or imagined science and technology upon society or individuals. Unlike fantasy, which relies on magic or the supernatural, science fiction grounds its imaginative elements in scientific principles, theories, and plausible extrapolations of current knowledge. "


So no, didn't make it up.

What part of Project Hail Mary doesn't fit that random definition?
 

Guurn

<Bronze Donator>
7,322
36,669
What part of Project Hail Mary doesn't fit that random definition?
"Not a very good science fiction movie but a fun feel good movie." I never claimed it wasn't science fiction, I just said it wasn't very good science fiction.

I can add on, here's the story. Hey random guy that had an idea once, teach our astronauts that idea! Nevermind that people in the real world don't think that non carbon based life is impossible. Wait, your idea isn't relevant, they are carbon based. Oh no, the ship blew up! Looks like you, with no training and no relevance are our best option! Everyone dies in the space ship but him. Meets rock. Let's learn to communicate, because that's not a totally normal thing to attempt or whatever... and I'm awkward. Magical space communicating science happens! Maybe the only science fiction thing in the movie other than the particles. Etcetera. I liked the movie, it just happened to be in space instead of a uncontacted tribe on earth or something. That's fine. I wish they would have shown their essential differences more, both in belief and tech.
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,549
20,440
"Not a very good science fiction movie but a fun feel good movie." I never claimed it wasn't science fiction, I just said it wasn't very good science fiction.

I can add on, here's the story. Hey random guy that had an idea once, teach our astronauts that idea! Nevermind that people in the real world don't think that non carbon based life is impossible. Wait, your idea isn't relevant, they are carbon based. Oh no, the ship blew up! Looks like you, with no training and no relevance are our best option! Everyone dies in the space ship but him. Meets rock. Let's learn to communicate, because that's not a totally normal thing to attempt or whatever... and I'm awkward. Magical space communicating science happens! Maybe the only science fiction thing in the movie other than the particles. Etcetera. I liked the movie, it just happened to be in space instead of a uncontacted tribe on earth or something. That's fine. I wish they would have shown their essential differences more, both in belief and tech.

Could have saved everyone some time and just said you didn't understand most of what was happening
 

reavor

I'm With HER ♀
<Bronze Donator>
6,215
22,502
"Not a very good science fiction movie but a fun feel good movie." I never claimed it wasn't science fiction, I just said it wasn't very good science fiction.

I can add on, here's the story. Hey random guy that had an idea once, teach our astronauts that idea! Nevermind that people in the real world don't think that non carbon based life is impossible. Wait, your idea isn't relevant, they are carbon based. Oh no, the ship blew up! Looks like you, with no training and no relevance are our best option! Everyone dies in the space ship but him. Meets rock. Let's learn to communicate, because that's not a totally normal thing to attempt or whatever... and I'm awkward. Magical space communicating science happens! Maybe the only science fiction thing in the movie other than the particles. Etcetera. I liked the movie, it just happened to be in space instead of a uncontacted tribe on earth or something. That's fine. I wish they would have shown their essential differences more, both in belief and tech.

precisely. It could have been good science fiction, if they for example would have explained and explored the differences in tech trees etc. between humans and rocks. also should have explained why didn't the rock seem to have a computer analog or an AI to translate? how the hell would it even have discovered space and stars when they can't see them? how would they not realize there is immense amounts of cosmic radiation when performing even rudimentary space faring tests?
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
51,266
93,922
precisely. It could have been good science fiction, if they for example would have explained and explored the differences in tech trees etc. between humans and rocks. also should have explained why didn't the rock seem to have a computer analog or an AI to translate? how the hell would it even have discovered space and stars when they can't see them? how would they not realize there is immense amounts of cosmic radiation when performing even rudimentary space faring tests?
In many ways, the movie could be considered a trailer for the book. Or more accurately a highlight reel of the plot in the book. It skips all the explanations that the book goes into detail into and I wasn't surprised afterward when I saw people asking the same questions the book answers.

The book starts with the premise that Rocky's civilization never had a reason to consider going to space or any means to do it until the Astrophage, and then yeeted a big 3d printed ship into space using a propulsion tech based off the Astrophage. Then it worked backward to build the science around all of that. This is how pretty much all scifi works.

We could criticize the movie for not explaining certain things, but really, for every unanswered question or concept you think wasn't explained in the movie, others have found five. What in the movie do you cut to make room for it? Probably the cute interactions between Ryland and Rocky, right? But that's not the movie they were trying to make.

If they cut the buddy scenes to add more explanation, do you think it would increase or decrease their revenue?

1785667662593.png
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1EyeRoll
Reactions: 2 users

Aldarion

Egg Nazi
12,112
32,997
I wasn't surprised afterward when I saw people asking the same questions the book answers.
It really is a little annoying. I don't think theres a single science question asked in this thread that wasnt directly addressed in the short, accessible book.
 

Mahes

Silver Baronet of the Realm
7,083
11,360
My wife and I enjoyed the movie. I understand that it would be difficult to convey all the science in a movie like this with just 3 hours to play. I also understand that the movie is Science "Fiction". Their science might not match ours. The premise was interesting. The story was even better.

I give it a solid 8.5/10.
 

Quaid

Trump's Staff
12,694
7,405
Aliens, Spaceballs and E.T. were bad SciFi movies because they didn't explain the science or tech trees.
 

Rabbit_Games

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
2,811
5,895
Aliens, Spaceballs and E.T. were bad SciFi movies because they didn't explain the science or tech trees.

I'm too lazy to look it up... but I wonder how rich folks got when E.T. used the Speak&Spell (?). Man, that movie was fucking excellent, and whatever they paid for those Ad placements had to have been the best investments those companies ever made.

Reeces Pieces!