Izo
Tranny Chaser
- 20,847
- 27,464
Same with doctors.
Heeeey, heeeey. Hey. Can I interest you in some fine Wegovy?
Same with doctors.
Lol at trying to put your “wealth management” bros on the same level as doctors and teachers… maybe more like a chiropractor or naturopathVery true. A lot are shit. Same with doctors. Same with teachers. Same with _________.
End of the day, nothing we have talked about here affects me. Just trying to add value to the conversation and make people aware of what’s out there that might fit their needs. You want a Simple SEP or you want to put $1000/mo into SMAs, that’s cool. I’ll refer you to one of my assistants. It’s not like we don’t help everyone. I just don’t. Like I’m sure you don’t do pro bono work.
This reminds of why I just say I do financial planning when people ask what I do.
100% agree with everything you're saying here.That's fine. For the vast majority of people it's a terrible way to invest your money and whether or not Burren is doing it, other people are aggressively marketing it to people who barely have anything to invest and they are getting sold on "infinite banking" horseshit that is being advertised as a smart and sound investment when it will mean orders of magnitude less money when you retire if you fall for it and keep doing it for a long time. My grandfather bought a couple of them and I have received these sales pitches myself and you would think they are giving you the keys to a happy life when all they're doing is ruining your retirement for their own gain. I'll take your word for it that there are rich people fucking around with it to avoid taxes etc, but 95% of people should run away from that shit and any national radio program would be irresponsible to say anything else.
EDIT: BTW, annuities pay very high commissions for obvious reasons so financial advisors have a lot of incentive to rationalize why people should buy them. Conversely, they can't make much money at all by telling people to invest in index funds or simple mutual funds.
I really hate to agree with Kirun. I mean really. But this is a pretty astute observation.Honestly, I'm just in awe. It's incredible how this place has somehow assembled one of the greatest concentrations of life's winners in the entire country. It's pretty much the Hall of Fame of hot, in-shape, tall, muscular, early-retired, financially bulletproof top 5–10%ers. Yet, despite standing atop Mount Olympus, they still manage to spend every waking moment whining about how epically, historically, and catastrophically screwed they are.
It's the most fascinating brand of cognitive dissonance: watching people at the absolute apex of the American success story convinced they're living through the collapse of civilization, all because Starbucks cups have the wrong holiday design and someone on CNN used a pronoun they didn't like. Bitching about the weather from the top deck of their yacht.
I don't know about the other stuff, but that covers like 5 people or something, right? How on earth could 5 people who have their financials sorted have found their way into a single retirement thread!?early-retired, financially bulletproof
I don't know about the other stuff, but that covers like 5 people or something, right?
100% there is crossover.I don't go into the general thread/politics section of this forum almost ever, but is there actual crossover between the people posting here and the troglodytes that live in that section of the forum?
As a percentage of active posters, it's absurdly high.
I mean, I believe most of the posters in this thread because there's a consistent thread of what people have been saying that lines up. I've posted about my situation occasionally in the investing thread for like 10 years. I could retire right now if I used the 4% rule.Seems about 5-10% of the US population is on track for "early retirement". So, I guess that probably roughly aligns when contrasted against all "active" posters, across the forums.
It felt high, since of the 40 posters in this thread, about 20-25% of them seem like they are on-track for early retirement or already retired. While there is definitely some selection bias going on, that just seemed absurdly high.
Bro if you think hardcore MMO players are more successful on average then I believeI've said it multiple times before, but people sometimes seem to forget/ignore all of the selection that had to happen for someone to be here now. What % of the population were in a position to be hardcore, min/maxing mmo'ers in 2000? The % of the population that even owned a 3d-capable pc in 2000 was super small. That those people, on average, might be more successful than the general population 25 years later shouldn't be surprising.
It would be interesting to hear when the posters in this thread actually last played an MMO.
Gotta remember "early retirement" is basically anything before 62 (or maybe even 65) depending on who's saying it.Seems about 5-10% of the US population is on track for "early retirement". So, I guess that probably roughly aligns when contrasted against all "active" posters, across the forums.
It felt high, since of the 40 posters in this thread, about 20-25% of them seem like they are on-track for early retirement or already retired. While there is definitely some selection bias going on, that just seemed absurdly high.
Salty is a new look for you man, trying something new on? Oh wait, same as always.Reading this thread has been very eye-opening..
Who could have guessed this humble little forum was actually the undisputed global headquarters for the world's hottest, fittest, tallest, most jacked, early-retiring, ultra-savvy financial wizards? Honestly, the sheer density of flawless, multi-millionaire, GIGACHAD specimens here makes Reddit's population of "totally real" astronauts, Navy SEALs, and crypto billionaires look downright humble by comparison.