Poll Should Tanoomba's ban be lifted

kegkilla said:

you would be wise to not to advocate for community votes as just cause for a ban.

Click to expand...

You would be wise to realize that your bullshit poll in Screenshots has no authority behind it, and no one gives a shit, and if you had the guts, you'd report my posts, try to get me banned, and then hope that the community upholds that ban via poll, which you're too much of a fucking coward pussy to try.

Nope.

Follow the process, faggot.

The only pussy here is the one who is terrified of following the legitimate process because he knows he can't win unless he breaks the system.

Keg changing the subject when he realizes he can't go any further.

If you have a problem with Zyz's posts, report them.

That is the process.

The mod team will decide if the posts are infraction worthy or not.

This community overwhelmingly approved these processes and sanctioned them, and this mod team to make those decisions, in overwhelming majorities during a democratic election.

This isn't like Rerolled, Keg, where we had unelected mods and uncaring admin teams with no community input that wasn't forced down their throats by protesting in the Ask A Mod thread and elsewhere.

I know you still think it is, but the reality is this community has a democratic process, and the time for community input is during the election season, which is every six months. During that time rules and new moderators are proposed, elected, and invested in the community.

This is what you're arguing with. Not me. You and Picasso can't seem to figure that out, but it is what it is.

1. AngryGerbil
   274 vote(s)
   
   
2. *
   Mario Speedwagon
   334 vote(s)
   
   
3. 
   Noodleface
   248 vote(s)
   
   
4. OhSeven
   140 vote(s)
   
   
5. 
   Utnayan
   208 vote(s)
   
   
   
   

Soygen said:

And the mods decided to unban Tanoomba. You can't have it both ways.

Click to expand...

We can't have it any way, because when the mods make a decision, and that decision is backed by the will of the community, we have an extreme vocal minority who are butthurt at democracy throwing a round the clock shit fit until the will of the mod team and the community are reversed.

You can't have it both ways, either. But that's what we're getting here, and that's why we're getting inconstant moderation decisions.

Realize, this mod team was overwhelmingly elected in the last round of elections, which occurred just a week or so prior to the start of this entire shit fit.

From the very moment they were legitimately and overwhelmingly elected, two or three vocal posters have been in a near constant war to hinder their moderation process.

Hence why a new mod like OhSeven might, as he just pointed out, question his decision.

The issue here is a couple of butthurt posters who are mad at the politics thread and, essentially, them getting demolished in the politics thread on the facts, doing everything they can to start shit in the community as a result.

Keg's part in this war literally started when he could not make the case for Milo being a pedophile, and a_skeleton_03 labeling Keg as a pedo and shadowbanning him for an hour for spamming that garbage all over the forum for a week, which made Keg so butthurt he decided to take a complete heel turn and support Tanoomba.