a_skeleton_03
<Banned>
- 29,948
- 29,765
The processor won't be an issue. I don't think there are differences in the kernel for either CPU, it is just going to be their released reference design.
Do you know anything about computers?Using an Intel processor, but an Nvidia card.
Wonder how fucked I may be? lol
It's not just a stripped kernel though, they are literally modifying the kernel to favor a better gaming experience.They all are but they add in all the things. SteamOS won't. You are looking at a stripped kernel with only just what it needs.
Have you ever done a gentoo stage 1? It's like that, for gaming.
The point is you aren't getting excited for Linux, you are getting excited for SteamOS. The only reason you need to know that it is Linux based for most people is just to know that it will be free and streamlined.I just don't see anything to get excited about linux-wise, they've been pushing it for a while and less than 9% of games on Steam support it. That's 180 vs over 2000. I own almost 2x more games on Steam than are compatible for Linux, and a number that aren't on Steam too. Perhaps in a few years this will change.
The streaming stuff I'm excited for, little else including the rumored stuff. I'd also lean more towards it being L4D, Half Life 2 being 9 years old next month and L4D resonates more more with current trends.
Lots of good points in your post, I was mainly referencing that they will strip the kernel down to start. It isn't your grandfather's linux.It's not just a stripped kernel though, they are literally modifying the kernel to favor a better gaming experience.
The reason to know it is linux-based for most people is because only 185 games and 13 demos on Steam games work on it.The point is you aren't getting excited for Linux, you are getting excited for SteamOS. The only reason you need to know that it is Linux based for most people is just to know that it will be free and streamlined.
You still aren't getting it. The SteamOS should support ALL games in their library.The reason to know it is linux-based for most people is because only 185 games and 13 demos on Steam games work on it.
Where has it said that, outside of streaming? If that's the case, then yeah my bad, but nothing I saw suggested otherwise.You still aren't getting it. The SteamOS should support ALL games in their library.
That was the entire point of them making their own OS.Where has it said that, outside of streaming?
Legacy games will require streaming, new games will come out with SteamOS support.I'm still not seeing it.
Hundreds of great games are already running natively on SteamOS. Watch for announcements in the coming weeks about all the AAA titles coming natively to SteamOS in 2014. Access the full Steam catalog of nearly 3000 games and desktop software titles via in-home streaming.
So games coming out will support it, there are a couple hundred now (must not be counting just Steam titles, or are including DLC), and the rest you have to stream from a gaming PC.
The OS is for ALL future games. Why would a unified and streamlined console level OS not interest you as a PC gamer?We are in agreement, I guess I just needed to specify I was referring to using this as a replacement for a gaming desktop. That's why I'm not really excited for anything beyond something simple to stream my PC to my living room or other supported device. An entire OS? No thanks beyond it serving as a larger metaphor of their ecosystem.
That whole "natively" part meaning you don't need to stream it from another PC.the AAA titles coming natively to SteamOS in 2014.
AMD has never had good software engineers. The idea that they will magically acquire a team of software engineers capable of writing amazingly optimized drivers for a new platform is dubious at best.There's no way that AMD lets their drivers fall behind on this platform if it really takes off. There may definitely be a performance disparity between NVidia and AMD cards early on, but I can't imagine that will last long. I have no preference either way, I've owned plenty of cards from both companies, all I want to see is good competition from both sides, that benefits the consumer the most. You never only want 1 option.
If you're referring to the old ATI shit, yes. ATI has always had shit drivers (especially for Linux). AMD was never that bad.AMD has never had good software engineers. The idea that they will magically acquire a team of software engineers capable of writing amazingly optimized drivers for a new platform is dubious at best.
AMD was never bad on the software front, but never what I'd call good either.If you're referring to the old ATI shit, yes. ATI has always had shit drivers (especially for Linux). AMD was never that bad.
nVidia though, they've rocked the house for linux drivers.
You're right, the big question is whether or not the steambox can run current games. Maybe Valve can push hard enough and make a convincing case to developers to publish on their platform but that'll be a very tough sell. And selling people on steambox without a huge library for it is going to be difficult also.I'm still not seeing it.
Hundreds of great games are already running natively on SteamOS. Watch for announcements in the coming weeks about all the AAA titles coming natively to SteamOS in 2014. Access the full Steam catalog of nearly 3000 games and desktop software titles via in-home streaming.
So games coming out will support it, there are a couple hundred now (must not be counting just Steam titles, or are including DLC), and the rest you have to stream from a gaming PC.