Kajiimagi
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
- 3,858
- 7,306
ZWO Seestar S50 same one I used to take the other pic.It's not easy to take pictures of distant planet, especially because they're very bright. What camera did you use ?
- 1
ZWO Seestar S50 same one I used to take the other pic.It's not easy to take pictures of distant planet, especially because they're very bright. What camera did you use ?
I need to read how they confirmed that because I don't see how it could be done. Any changes would by definition just be it's future.entanglement feels like something we discovered way too early and is still very obscure (at least to me). But saying something's future influence the past is on another level.
The galaxy looks amazing.In case anyone wonders why I never post planets with my little telescope, this is why. It's 'supposed' to be Saturn. No need to tell me, I know it looks like shit. The other pic is NGC 925 a galaxy 30 million light years away.
yeah thanks. I *may* have posted it before. I made a list of items I've shot and it wasn't on that list. However when I went to stack the photos I saw I already had a folder from a year ago with the same name.The galaxy looks amazing.
There are no settings unfortunately. Its a fixed unit , all the pics/images are processed via software. They keep messing with the firmware, before the one I posted it would not even let me stack images. I didn't buy it to post pics of planets.here's a tiny picture I took of Saturn with my DSLR and a 600mm lens (i may have posted it before also) :
View attachment 608061
This is really like "hey look this is Saturn, let's see if I can grab a pic of it", handheld. However, the settings of the camera are similar to a shot in a room during a day.
ISO 400
Aperture f/6.3
Duration : 1/60 s
I'm not sure how deep you can adjust the settings on your seestar ? But it's worth trying, I'm sure you could get all the moons (i didnt get any unfortunately)
Did they steal the plans for the capsule from Boeing?Anyone hear that China has some astronauts stranded in space with a damaged capsule?

Nearly everything about it has been odd. Everybody who has been saying "Its a comet, its a comet, its a comet!" without explaining all the oddities since the start has been getting owned. Yeah maybe its still a natural object, but its not like any comet we've seen before.We can see 3i/atlas again. No tail is odd.
But even then, how do you even get naturally occurring pure nickel? Everything about this object is defying the known laws of the universe as we know it, almost as if that’s the entire point of this object. Something our institutions and government can’t deny.Nearly everything about it has been odd. Everybody who has been saying "Its a comet, its a comet, its a comet!" without explaining all the oddities since the start has been getting owned. Yeah maybe its still a natural object, but its not like any comet we've seen before.
We can see 3i/atlas again. No tail is odd.
Yep the nickel is a weird one, one of the many reasons you have to at least consider artificial origin.But even then, how do you even get naturally occurring pure nickel? Everything about this object is defying the known laws of the universe as we know it, almost as if that’s the entire point of this object. Something our institutions and government can’t deny.
If it's artificial origin then it is very, very old, right? Given it's trajectory, it appears to be in an orbit around the center of the galaxy just like the solar system, right? In the diagram below red is supposed to be 3i/Atlas and yellow is the solar system.Yep the nickel is a weird one, one of the many reasons you have to at least consider artificial origin.
If it's artificial origin then it is very, very old, right? Given it's trajectory, it appears to be in an orbit around the center of the galaxy just like the solar system, right? In the diagram below red is supposed to be 3i/Atlas and yellow is the solar system.
If it is artificial in origin, what would be the point of it? Could it just be space junk that someone just cast off? If it's launched intentionally, it was done by someone very very patient, as age estimates are 8-14 billion years old.
View attachment 608326
This does not deviate from current physics models at all. While I wont contend that there's not lots of dark matter magic retardation that goes on with wider scale models, this is not a strong example to point to. Obviously its off-gassing a ton, but we're not seeing anything. Wracking my brain on it for a moment I came up with a simple hypothesis. Maybe its offgassing hydrogen, because its been floating in the dark void for billions of years? It'd obviously take an insanely long time for a drifting interstellar object to get coated in hydrogen. Sublimation would prevent that for any solar-system bound object. Even pluto is far too warm.I like these objects because they show how bad our physics models are. Angry calculated that you'd need 9 starships of thrust burning for a day to account for the strange acceleration. I just think our math is wrong.
Wide binaries are always wrong, galaxy rotation is almost always wrong etc. Maybe they will sprinkle some magical dark matter fairy dust on the comet and explain the bad math away.