Need more of this shit happening. Maybe enough retards will be forced to step down and then one with common sense will take the helm.http://bgr.com/2013/06/14/andy-lees-...cal-microsoft/
Microsoft executive Andy Lees has stepped down from his new corporate development role.
Not to mention right now on the XBox 360, is it me, or are the digital downloads of games that are also available as discs almost twice as expensive as just going and buying a *new* copy of the game on disc?If anyone thinks games on Xbox live or whatever Microsoft will call it on Xbone are going to be cheaper than their store bought counter parts, I have entire nations worth of infrastructure to sell you, at rock bottom rates.
I'll believe Microsoft willingly charges less than 60 dollars for a brand new digital game on release date than they do the physical copy when I see it.
So... the game is basically a movie, player optional. Drivetard, engage!article_sl said:The combat itself actually reminds me of Rocksteady's Batman where you have primary attack buttons that you press in a linear sequence more so than in combinations, and a counter button that relies heavily on timing. Executions play a large part in your overall success in combat (not to mention they look absolutely bad ass) and, as you probably noticed in the trailer, prompt you to complete a button sequence in the vein of a quicktime event. Don't let the idea of doing quicktime events deter you as they're actually optional. If you mess up during the sequence by pressing the wrong attack button, you still hit your opponent but the execution won't look as cool or reward you as much in the way of money and buffs.
History as a guide, they're VERY slow to react to the retail market for their digital store for 360. Unlike PSN that's at least moderately nimble with it. (Although far from perfect - but AC3 $40 on 360 w/ Gold vs. $20.69 on PS3 w/ PS+ right now is one example I can see of an old game holding "too much value" on theirs)Not to mention right now on the XBox 360, is it me, or are the digital downloads of games that are also available as discs almost twice as expensive as just going and buying a *new* copy of the game on disc?
Have you ever played Battlefield 3 on 360/PS3 and then on PC? It's mind-fucking-blowingly apparent how awful the console version looks.Sure, a high-rez texture pack makes a huge difference when I'm playing Skyrim at 1080P on a 27" monitor sitting 2 feet in front of it. Not so much on a 50" TV 10 feet away. It might help a little bit, but it won't be some night and day difference that most people will notice while playing on their living room TV at a normal viewing distance. The problem is, 1080p on 40+ inch devices just isn't that great, there's a lot of blurring there at such a low PPI(especially when compared to gaming on a PC)
Not true, Counter-Strike stand alone version. I think.When steam first came out, no games required it--I could just as easily buy a physical disc and avoid steam.