The Last of Us

Sanrith Descartes · Feb 4, 2023

pharmakos said:
When looking for data I actually proved myself wrong, but not in the way you might think -- I just found many sources saying women prefer gay male porn, not just softcore homoerotic stuff

When no one is looking, many women are watching gay porn

Heterosexual porn is designed for men, and a researcher finds that it often makes women uncomfortable.

www.nbcnews.com

https://www.advocate.com/love-and-sex/2018/7/18/study-many-women-prefer-gay-male-porn-because-its-authentic

Women Tell Us Why They Prefer Porn With No Women

“I used to YouTube ‘emo boys kissing’ which was a gateway, I think.”

www.vice.com

Straight Men Take Note: 11 Women Confess What They Love About Gay Porn

“I read more gay male erotica than I watch gay porn, but what I noticed most about gay porn compared to straight porn is it’s much more sensual–at least what I’ve seen. A lo…

thoughtcatalog.com

Why Straight Women Watch Gay Porn

Some have accused straight women who enjoy gay porn of fetishizing gay men. Is this a fair criticism?

www.insidehook.com

Why some women prefer to watch gay male pornography

Research published in the scientific journal Porn Studies has investigated the motivations behind women who watch male-on-male pornography. The findings

www.psypost.org

This Researcher Discovered Something Very Surprising About How Women Watch Porn

This Researcher Discovered Something Very Surprising About How Women Watch Porn

www.iflscience.com

The straight women who have a thing for gay porn

Interesting, very interesting.

www.thepinknews.com

https://www.pride.com/need-know/2014/10/02/science-says-women-prefer-gay-guy-porn-and-lesbian-porn-duh-all-other-types

Girls Who Like Boys Who Like Boys

Why more straight women are getting turned on by gay guys — in pop culture, porn, and real life.

www.cosmopolitan.com

Why gay porn appeals to women

Heterosexual porn displays women ‘being fucked’ by men and it’s demeaning

mg.co.za

Sexuality: Why do some straight women and lesbians watch gay porn? - OUT FRONT

Yes, even some lesbians like it. This phenomenon isn’t limited to obscure subcultures. If you’ve seen the 2010 comedy film The Kids Are All Right, you’ll remember ...

www.outfrontmagazine.com

Why are so many women watching male gay porn?

And does it mean anything about how we express our sexuality?

metro.co.uk

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/03/straight-men-and-lesbian-porn/472521/

Only One Kind of Sex Turns Me On—and I Can Never, Ever Have It

Even my therapist thinks it’s bad!

slate.com

For those that might object to any of these sources, here's the fucking DAILY BEAST writing about it. Surely most of the people here think they're reputable?

The Lesbians Who Love Male Gay Porn

In the new movie The Kids Are All Right, the lesbian couple played by Julianne Moore and Annette Bening watch male gay porn, and enjoy it. Jacob Bernstein explains the phenomenon.

www.thedailybeast.com

Why women enjoy gay male erotica

A porn streaming website ran some numbers and found that, of their 115 million daily viewers, over a third of the viewers of gay male porn were women. Unlike instant orgasms and no-clean up sex, women enjoying m-m porn isn't a myth that Hollywood created.

www.dipseastories.com

This is interesting: More than half of women who watch male gay porn imagine themselves as MEN during erotic sexual fantasies 'to feel less guilty', scientist reveals

More than half of women who watch gay porn imagine themselves as MEN

According to research led by Dr Lucy Neville, a Lecturer in Criminology from the University of Leicester, 55 per cent of the women surveyed imagined themselves as men (stock image).

www.dailymail.co.uk

Enough?

So wait. Maybe we don't speak the same language. When I say data to support a position, it's actual statistical research that's peer reviewed and has been replicated.

You posted shit like:
advocate.com
pride.com
dailybeast.com
outfront.com
pinknews.com

As data sources.

Caeden · Feb 4, 2023

pharmakos said:
Also 40% of 25 women would be 10. Not 6-8. That math is pretty easy come on bro.

The only thing fucky is your reading comprehension. 2+8 is 10 dumbfuck.

11% came from the IFR. 40% from the Pew survey with a massive fudge factor layered on it. Fairly obvious you either can not follow arguments or understand statistics. Those are just fucking bounds.

But as my last point, the argument was a large portion of women SPECIFICALLY LIKE WATCHING MEN TENDERLY FUCKING MEN PORN. The 40% is women who watch ANY TYPE OF PORN. Jesus H Christ. This is not a hard concept. A vast majority of men watch porn. That doesn’t mean a vast majority fucking watch cuck porn.

I’m out. I deal enough with stupidity out of engineers and scientists I respect in person to argue on a Saturday about a stupid fucking show with math illiterates.

pharmakos · Feb 4, 2023

Sanrith Descartes said:
So wait. Maybe we don't speak the same language. When I say data to support a position, it's actual statistical research that's peer reviewed and has been replicated.

You posted shit like:
advocate.com
pride.com
dailybeast.com
outfront.com
pinknews.com

As data sources.

The 40% figure supports my assertion that "a sizeable portion of viewers actually are into that shit" tho. Hollywood is perfectly alright catering to a sizeable minority from time to time. Y'all helped me prove my point. Thank you.

Sanrith Descartes · Feb 4, 2023

pharmakos said:
Your 40% figure supports my assertion that "a sizeable portion of viewers actually are into that shit" tho. Hollywood is perfectly alright catering to a sizeable minority from time to time. You helped me prove my point. Thank you.

My 40% ??

pharmakos · Feb 4, 2023

Sanrith Descartes said:
My 40% ??

Edited. You morons all blur together for me.

"The 40% figure supports my assertion that "a sizeable portion of viewers actually are into that shit" tho. Hollywood is perfectly alright catering to a sizeable minority from time to time. Y'all helped me prove my point. Thank you."

Sanrith Descartes · Feb 4, 2023

pharmakos said:
Edited. You morons all blur together for me.

You quote gay magazines as support for your gay position but we are morons?

pharmakos · Feb 4, 2023

Sanrith Descartes said:
You quote gay magazines as support for your gay position but we are morons?

I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho. But if I did that you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc. I know your type. Not generally worth the effort going that far. Especially when y'all come up with figures yourself that literally support my claim. Why would I bother finding research when Caeden proved my point for me?

And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron, even tho my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong. Get over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source.

Sanrith Descartes · Feb 4, 2023

pharmakos said:
I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho. But if I did that you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc. I know your type. Not generally worth the effort going that far. Especially when y'all come up with figures yourself that literally support my claim. Why would I bother finding research when Caeden proved my point for me?

And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron, even tho my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong. Get over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source.

"I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho." And yet you didn't. You chose gay magazines instead.

"you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc." So we would attack the credibility of a peer reviews journal but you figured using gay magazines would be the better solution?

"And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron" - Oh, we follow your "logic" friendo

"my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong" - I didnt even know who the fuck you were until you began this splurgfest of shitty posting across a half dozen or more threads two days ago.

"et over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source." - I did judge the data. You sourced it from gay magazines. Having the advocate.com write that straight women love seeing gay men suck cock isnt the mic drop you apparently think it is.

pharmakos · Feb 4, 2023

Sanrith Descartes said:
"I was being lazy. I could have found some peer reviewed journal articles from Sci Hub tho." And yet you didn't. You chose gay magazines instead.

"you guys would find a way to object by saying the journal is too small to be reputable or etc." So we would attack the credibility of a peer reviews journal but you figured using gay magazines would be the better solution?

"And yes not following this logic genuinely does make you a moron" - Oh, we follow your "logic" friendo

"my reputation is making you emotionally feel like it must be me that's wrong" - I didnt even know who the fuck you were until you began this splurgfest of shitty posting across a half dozen or more threads two days ago.

"et over yourself and get over me and judge the data and message rather than the source." - I did judge the data. You sourced it from gay magazines. Having the advocate.com write that straight women love seeing gay men suck cock isnt the mic drop you apparently think it is.

Not all of the magazines were gay magazines. Many were reputable news sources. You're grasping at straws. And contributing to the shitting up of this thread. Have a good day.

RobXIII · Feb 4, 2023

Sooo uh, back to the TV show? Looking forward to season 2!

Sanrith Descartes · Feb 4, 2023

pharmakos said:
Not all of the magazines were gay magazines.

Oh. Thats different.

Sanrith Descartes · Feb 4, 2023

This thread may now return to its regularly schedule bitching about the gay episode for the next 24-hours. Peace has been restored. No need to thank me.

TomServo · Feb 4, 2023

Sanrith Descartes said:
This thread may now return to its regularly schedule bitching about the gay episode for the next 24-hours. Peace has been restored. No need to thank me.

Can we just ban this dumb faggot? It's like he ossoi and phisey take turns.

Sanrith Descartes · Feb 4, 2023

TomServo said:
It's like he ossoi and phisey take turns.

Have you ever seen all three of them post at the same time?

Falstaff · Feb 4, 2023

Falstaff said:

This thread delivers. Didn’t think I’d be this accurate 9 pages ago but you guys never disappoint.

Xevy · Feb 4, 2023

I saw the post with 30 article links and for a second I think somehow Lithose got un-ignored and raised from the dead.

Lanx · Feb 4, 2023

pharmakos said:
Edited. You morons all blur together for me.

his dyslexia is acting up again, but he blames foh for it

the first step is taking responsibility

wormie · Feb 4, 2023

Xevy said:
I saw the post with 30 article links and for a second I think somehow Lithose got un-ignored and raised from the dead.

You misspelled Vanessa.

Drinsic · Feb 4, 2023

RobXIII said:
Sooo uh, back to the TV show? Looking forward to season 2!

how long have you had that avatar

Gavinmad · Feb 4, 2023

Xevy said:
I saw the post with 30 article links and for a second I think somehow Lithose got un-ignored and raised from the dead.

What kind of pussy felt the need to put Lithose on ignore?

The Last of Us

Von Clippowicz

Silver Baronet of the Realm

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd

Von Clippowicz

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd

Von Clippowicz

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd

Von Clippowicz

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd

Urinal Cake Consumption King

Von Clippowicz

Von Clippowicz

Von Clippowicz

Ahn'Qiraj Raider

Log Wizard

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner

privileged excrementlord

Mr. Poopybutthole