Alternatively, 3I/ATLAS could be a spacecraft powered by nuclear energy, and the dust emitted from its frontal surface might be from dirt that accumulated on its surface during its interstellar travel. This cannot be ruled out, but requires better evidence to be viable.
This article reads like a movie script right before someone gets whacked…![]()
My Journey to Become a UFO Whistleblower (01 of 03)
Part One: Origins, Employment, Spillageopen.substack.com
I was curious where Jesse Michael's came from. Turns out, he's a Peter Thiel guy. Seems like Thiel is making some sort of play at UAPs/NHI or whatever. He's given some interesting speeches on the Antichrist lately.
Not sure if this has been discussed, the latest discussion from Avi Loeb on 3I/Atlas
Basically he considers three possible natural explanations for the observed light emitted from this object.
1. a primordial black hole
2. a giant radioactive rock
3. an object heated by friction as it travels through space
And finds that the data are not consistent with any of these.
Def isn't a craft dude.Seems to me like there might be more evidence of Atlas being a craft than there is of Atlas being a natural phenomenon, at this point. They can't explain it's behavior, and every attempt to attribute it to natural causes falls apart.
This also calls into question what the hell Oumuamua actually was, given that it exhibited similar behaviors, also had an interstellar origin, and was never really adequately explained. I think we've got better tech now as far as being able to actually get a good look at Atlas, where we couldn't get a good look at Oumuamua.
Atlas is on course to pass well clear of Earth, yeah? If it starts mysteriously changing course towards us, it may be time to freak out.