The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
You are now aware you are the only person confused about what has been going on in this thread.

As usual.
Dude, you've been making big claims about my stance for days. What the fuck do you think my stance is? The closest I can guess is "Emma was raped", which I have proven many times over is not and has never been my stance. Yet, you seem to be under the impression that you are still arguing against my stance. Again, what do you think my stance is?
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Tanoomba;1515957 said:
PLEASE LET ME RESTART THE DEBATE BACK TO THREE DAYS AGO SO I DONT HAVE TO ADDRESS THE GLARING AND IRREFUTABLE FOUNDATIONAL FLAW IN MY WORLDVIEW! PLEASE!!!/QUOTE]

 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Let me ask you something, Tanoomba.

Is there any controversial position you've taken in your time in this community, where you have not finally just devolved into screaming that you, or the person whom you are defending, has been "misrepresented", yes or no?

Because I think the true answer to that question is very elucidating as to how you perceive yourself in relation to the world aka perpetual victim.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Let's put it this way. Think of how arrogant it is to presume that everyone else is just too stupid to understand your point.

Occam's razor. Is it not more likely that the issue is that you are simply too stupid to understand why they are rejecting your arguments? Which is more likely, the hundreds to thousands of people in this community who all revile you are dumber than one guy, or that one guy is dumber than them?

Of course, the problem we then encounter is that the stupid can be so stupid that they are unaware that they are stupid, and they are often too stupid to be able to be made to understand that they are stupid as well.

 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Uh yeah two days ago.

The rest has just been us basically throwing peanuts at the monkey to get him to type.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
A better name for the game would be "How many times can we get Tanoomba to restate the same fallacy in different ways" but it doesn't really flow from the tongue like Last Word Contest, I begrudgingly admit.
 

lurkingdirk

AssHat Taint
<Medals Crew>
51,269
249,953
5ZMjGw1.gif
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Let me ask you something, Tanoomba.

Is there any controversial position you've taken in your time in this community, where you have not finally just devolved into screaming that you, or the person whom you are defending, has been "misrepresented", yes or no?

Because I think the true answer to that question is very elucidating as to how you perceive yourself in relation to the world aka perpetual victim.
Here's what I noticed: Every time, or damn near every time, somebody tries to argue with me about something, they end up arguing against something I've never said. Oh, theybelievethey are addressing my actual stance, to be sure, but confirmation bias and groupthink distort their ability to debate me honestly. How do I know it's dishonest? Because, every time, I patiently and honestly clarify my point, which is usually not what is being argued against.

Now I know what you're thinking: "It's more likely that YOU are wrong than EVERYONE ELSE is wrong!" I don't care about "likely", the proof is all right there in black and white. I know what I'm saying. I choose my words deliberately. When people misrepresent me (and they do, regularly) I PROVE them wrong with my actual words, which I don't edit or change after the fact. Just because most (certainly including you) continue to lie through your teeth to try to save face and present a false narrative to cover up what's actually happening, doesn't change reality.

I do agree with you on one thing, though: You are WAAAAAAAAY too stupid to ever even fathom how stupid you are.




A better name for the game would be "How many times can we get Tanoomba to restate the same fallacy in different ways" but it doesn't really flow from the tongue like Last Word Contest, I begrudgingly admit.
What fallacy did I state? Come on, Jhodi, you made a claim. Back it up. I back up my claims.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
You're both late, the actual last word was this post by me:



Sye Ten's argument at the start of the debate also exactly mirrors Tanoomba's argument regarding Emma's rape.

"Why is it reasonable to believe Emma was raped? Because quite simply, it is true she was raped. Premise 1: It is good to believe true things. Premise 2: It is true that Emma was raped. Conclusion: It is good to believe Emma was raped."

Its hilarious how close these arguments are to each other. You can just replace "God" with "Emma" and that says a shit load about the mindset of the "She was raped" crowd.

And the Dillahunty response is pretty much exactly our case here:

1. Ensuring our beliefs are reasonable is the important issue, not that they are 100% perfectly correct all of the time in all cases in all places, since this is not possible anyway. The crux of Tanoomba's argument pits the perfect as the enemy of the good enough
2. It is not reasonable to believe Emma was raped, because no evidence has been presented to justify the claim that she was raped. The claim that she was raped has not been demonstrated to be a reasonable conclusion based on the evidence presented.
3. Whenever we are presented with a claim, the default is not believing, because otherwise we end up believing all sorts of nonsense like the Moon Landings were faked, and 9-11 was a hoax, and Anita wasn't really talking about Hitman.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Yes, congratulations on your victory against an imaginary opponent who believes whatever you make up for him. Great job.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
THIS IS SO UNFAIR WHY WON'T YOU LET ME RESTART THE DEBATE BY DEMANDING YOU RECITE ME EVERYTHING IVE ALREADY BEEN CITED 100 TIMES AND IGNORED ALREADY! THIS IS BULLSHIT! WHAT THE FUCK!!!
ftfy

No amount of typing, which no one is reading, myself especially, is going to fix this for you, retard.

So again

We are not going to restart the debate you've already lost when this forum community, about 10 different people, have all explained to you, in detail, why you are retarded on this issue.

If you wish to discuss this further you must either

1. Admit you are wrong because your format is an invalid structure
or
2. Reformulate your argument and try again

That's it. Otherwise, you can just take your happy little dipshit ass back about 15 pages and reread the conversation until you figure it out.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Yes, congratulations on your victory against my accurately represented position which I have no cogent rebuttal for, hence why I'm demanding and begging and cajoling and pleading for you to restart a debate I've already lost by demanding evidence already given that I ignored the first 1000 times it was presented!
Yeah, still not working, but I appreciate your admission of defeat, however coaxed out of you it had to be, and however you had to couch it to salve that bleeding anus you have right now.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Here's what I noticed: Every time, or damn near every time, somebody tries to argue with me about something, they end up arguing against something I've never said.
You are now aware this has never happened.

The issue is you are too stupid to understand that they understood your argument, and still rejected it, because you are wrong.

There is no universe where every single person you have met has misunderstood your position.

It does not exist.

Thanks for playing.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Actually, Jhodi, you haven't cited me once. Not once.

I corrected you the very first time you misrepresented me. I have proven, beyond the shadow of any doubt, that I have never taken the stance you attributed to me. I practically begged you to quote me expressing what you state I claimed. You failed repeatedly to do so. And yet you clutched your false narrative to your heart and proceeded to make every single ass-backwards post revolve around said false narrative.


Here, watch this:

No, you fucking retard. 2+2=4

I WIN USING JHODI LOGIC!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.