The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

hodj_sl said:

Yeah, still not working, but I appreciate your admission of defeat, however coaxed out of you it had to be, and however you had to couch it to salve that bleeding anus you have right now.

Click to expand...

Why would I have a rebuttal for a stance I never took? I'm not going to argue a stance that you insist I've taken, despite never taking that stance and you being unable to actually quote me ever taking that stance. Are you really this retarded? I mean, seriously?

Last word?

hodj_sl said:

You are now aware this has never happened.

Click to expand...

It has happened repeatedly. But don't take my word for it, it's all still there in black and white. Facts don't lie.

hodj_sl said:

Actually, we've cited you prolifically.

Continue dealing with it and being upset.

Click to expand...

As usual, you talk the talk but don't walk the walk.

Fucking quote me expressing the stance you believe I have taken. (I honestly don't even know what that might be any more, as I've already proven your initial claim false.)

Put up or shut up.

hodj_sl said:

Tanoomba seems to think that just repeating that he's been misrepresented is somehow going to resolve the fundamental flaw at the core of his argument.

Click to expand...

I don't believe that at all. I have objectively proven your claims about my stance wrong. You have not countered with even a speck of evidence that supports what you state I have claimed.

No amount of reality-twisting mental gymnastics will change that, Jhodi.

hodj_sl said:

Either reformulate the argument so that it is syllogistically valid, or admit you cannot, and thus are incorrect.

Click to expand...

WHAT ARGUMENT?

I've clarified my stance a thousand times. What the fuck are you even asking for?

(See, Fanaskin? this is exactly what that picture describes. Jhodi decides on arbitrary rules that, by design, dismiss the actual point, in order to "choose his own adventure". It is incredibly dishonest and I'm honestly shocked you don't see it.)

hodj_sl said:

If you've lost the plot so badly you can't even recall your own arguments, then you really need to go back to the basics and start back from page 1 of the debate.

Something I suggested you do earlier so you'd stop looking as foolish as you do currently.

Shit you can't even keep track of your own positions anymore.

How pathetic.

Click to expand...

I know my own arguments very well.

Let's recap:

- We DON'T KNOW whether Sulkowicz was raped. That's a FACT. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that because I'm not.
- There is no hard evidence that proves Sulkowicz was raped. That's a FACT. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that because I'm not.
- There is no hard evidence that proves Solkowicz was lying. That's a FACT. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that because I'm not.
- There is reasonable doubt she might have lied, and reasonable doubt she was telling the truth. That's a FACT. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that because I'm not.
- I personally believe there's a decent chance she's telling the truth. That's a personal opinion and requires no proof beyond listing several reasons why I am inclined to have those beliefs, which I did. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that because I'm not.
- I never claimed Sulkoqicz was raped. That's a FACT. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that because I'm not.

Did I miss anything?

You keep asking me to admit I was wrong. About WHAT? What did I say that you believe I was wrong about? I just listed everything that could reasonably be labeled a "stance" of mine, and not a single one is wrong. I honestly don't know what you want.

AngryGerbil_sl said:

So how much is a 'decent chance' that Emma was raped?

Click to expand...

Who cares? I've said repeatedly that our personal beliefs mean fuck all. All that matters is what can be proven. Unfortunately, in this case nothing has been (or likely ever will be) proven.

Why is it so important to dwell on what I see as a likely scenario? I listed the reasons why I see it as likely. There was nothing unreasonable or dishonest in how I arrived at my opinion. What kind of dirt are you looking for, dude? You're not going to find it.

hodj_sl said:

Your inability to grasp basic logic of a fundamental nature isn't an argument.

Reformulate, or admit you were wrong.

These are your only options.

You don't get to debate the semantics of what you meant by 2 when you concluded 2 and 2 summated equated to 5.

Click to expand...

Reformulate WHAT?

Jesus Christ.

hodj_sl said:

You don't get to debate the semantics of what you meant by 2 when you concluded 2 and 2 summated equated to 5.

Click to expand...

See? You make this claim and back it up by nothing. When did I say two plus two equals five? Why do you refuse to ever address what I'm actually saying?