The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Incidentally, pointing out how you use "didn't read" to avoid having to address points that contradict your narrative is an EXCELLENT rebuttal, thank you very much.
 
Soygen

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,585
45,255
Coming into this thread:

131.gif
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
There are a couple of new Tanoomba posts above this I just wanted to make sure and point out that I didn't read them, either.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Probably the fault of the terminally myopic retard who thinks burden shifting fallacies and appeals to perfection fallacies are substitutes for proving Emma was raped.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
Probably the fault of the terminally myopic retard who thinks burden shifting fallacies and appeals to perfection fallacies are substitutes for proving Emma was raped.
Click to expand...
Again:

- I employed no burden-shifting fallacies. YOU made a claim that YOU were unable to back up.
- I never appealed to perfection. With no proof she was lying and no proof she was telling the truth, then by definition we don't know what happened. It really is that simple.

...Keep crying about it, though.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
You can deny it all you want, I've already demonstrated that to be the case. Like I said, your arts education failed to teach you to think linearly, so you can comprehend how some events come before other events, and that you have to demonstrate the validity of prior claims before you get to bitch about conclusions drawn about your failure to do so.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
You can deny it all you want, I've already demonstrated that to be the case. Like I said, your arts education failed to teach you to think linearly, so you can comprehend how some events come before other events, and that you have to demonstrate the validity of prior claims before you get to bitch about conclusions drawn about your failure to do so.
Click to expand...
You have demonstrated no such thing. Objectively.

Reminder:

Tanoomba_sl said:
My claim: WE DON'T KNOW what happened. Proof does NOT EXIST that can allow us to conclusively know what happened.
Your claim: Sulkowicz was lying, which has been proven by (copious) hard evidence.
Click to expand...
Your only attempt to back up your claim washere, and you failed miserably:
hodj_sl said:
the claim that she is a liar is based on the combination of her failure to justify her claim that she was raped, combined with her behaviors in private and public as a result of her failure to justify her claim in the most lax and forgiving court room setting possible.
Click to expand...
None of that constitutes "hard evidence" by ANY metric. If you had even a shred of integrity or honestly you would have thrown in the towel and admitted that your claim was factually incorrect. Instead, you decided to play the "let me make as many baseless insults as I can to hide my shame" game, which is your go-to every time I school you (and this has happened several times now).

Time for another super-convenient "Didn't read", right?
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Its pretty easy to predict something when I already told you what the criteria for it happening would be like 3 posts up, you mongoloid retard.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
So you admit that you're the reason no actual discussion is taking place. Much obliged.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
You've explicitly made clear that you are unwilling to read any post of mine that is 3 sentences or longer.

You've created an arbitrary limitation that, by necessity, prevents any actual discussion from taking place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.