The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
See?

Its just the Tanoomba Cycle:

1. Make up stupid claim
2. Fail to back it up with evidence
3. Spend the rest of your life attempting to re-litigate the issue until you can claim "victory" on the ashes of your own credibility.

The fact that you are still desperately trying to re-litigate all those issues, and all it takes is the mere mention of them to send you off on a cycle of desperately copying and pasting links no one reads to try and salvage your face says all that needs to be said about how truly badly you've "lost" here.

And everywhere.

How truly badly you've losteverythingand wonnothingby these actions.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
Creationists like Tanoomba attempting to suss out fallacies in arguments they are presented with is always pretty hilarious to watch though, I do admit.
Click to expand...
Ah, the "Creationist" schtick again. Quick check: Is he basing this claim on my actual words? ...No? Well, allow me to retort:

Jhodi claims a creationist is someone for whom no amount of evidence will sway them from their beliefs. He has found exactly zero cases where I demonstrated this behavior. On the other hand, inthis postI show that Jhodi himself is more than happy to ignore any and all information that doesn't suit his narrative, and that he exploits the "appeal to perfection" fallacy even while accusing others of doing the same (in inapplicable situations). You can't make up this level of hypocrisy, you literally can't.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
1. Make up stupid claim
Click to expand...
Again.I never made that claim.

The Hodj cycle:
1 - Make up a ridiculous straw man that in no way reflects his opponent's stance.
2 - Back up that straw man with nothing.
3 - Ignore any and all evidence that proves he made up the straw man.
4 - Insist that evidence be provided for the straw man.
5 - Include a generous number of insults and snarky personal attacks (also backed up by nothing, natch).
6 - Repeat steps 3 to 5 indefinitely, until his opponent basically gets sick of it and leaves.
7 - Claim victory.

It must be driving you crazy that I'm not giving in to step 6, isn't it?
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Your attempt to reset the conversation and re-litigate your stupidity for the 1000th time in four days has failed.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
How is it not is the question you should be asking.

The Tanoomba cycle is clear. What part of it are you not comprehending?

Anyway, I gotta go to Louisville this afternoon for awhile, so I'll be heading out in about half an hour.

Gonna go shitpost about Pokemon Go or bitch about the constant 404ing of the forums the past two days or something.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Your attempt to re-litigate this issue for the 1001th time in 4 days has failed.
 
DickTrickle

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,779
16,155
hodj_sl said:
And any response by you longer than three sentences, or that does not contain either links to the evidence that these texts were substantially altered to the benefit of Nungesser, or an admission that such evidence does not exist, will not be read.
Click to expand...
Technically he has already admitted that evidence of the texts being substantially altered does not exist, since he never said that actual content of the text was altered in any way, substantial or not. So, you've had your admission all along.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
DickTrickle_sl said:
Technically he has already admitted that evidence of the texts being substantially altered does not exist,since he never said that actual content of the text was altered in any way, substantial or not.So, you've had your admission all along.
Click to expand...
ftfy

That's why I've been saying the argument has been over for four days.
 
DickTrickle

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,779
16,155
So you're saying he made a claim he never made. He clearly said it was the implication/explanation drawn from the texts that would differ from a Sulkowicz/Nungesser perspective, not the actual content.

This is easily shown to be possible/true because the Nungesser lawsuit provides a different explanation for post-alleged-rape texts than the Sulkowicz annotations provided to Jezebel.

I don't know if you're trolling of if this is just the end result of years of dealing with Tanoomba trying your patience, but this seems like one of the weakest things to go after him for.
 
DickTrickle

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,779
16,155
I mean, if this truly is trolling (and I'm not saying it is), it's actually pretty brilliant and meta.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Listen, Jhodi:

You made a straw man.I have proven such.

What don't you understand about this?

Explain your confusion and I will happily fill in whatever blanks you may have.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Your attempt to re-litigate this issue for the 1003rd time in four days has failed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.