The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.
- Thread starter hodj
- Start date
- Status
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
a_skeleton_03: "Why is everything associated to rape now?"
If you're asking why that particular college's slogan is being associated with rape (which is a much more reasonable question than "everything"), it's probably because that particular college was in the news for their former football players committing rape.
I'm not saying over-sensitivity doesn't exist or that people don't blow things that don't matter out of proportion, but this is not a case of that.
If you're asking why that particular college's slogan is being associated with rape (which is a much more reasonable question than "everything"), it's probably because that particular college was in the news for their former football players committing rape.
I'm not saying over-sensitivity doesn't exist or that people don't blow things that don't matter out of proportion, but this is not a case of that.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Lith: "People like you delicateflower, the idiots that have such a draw to stereotyping and tribal views of society? Have been the bane of human existence since the beginning. You're no different than the people you dislike, dogmatic, and ideological; more concerned about your "tribe" and your image/standing in it than critical evaluation."
Heh heh. How many times have you used the phrase "these people", Lith?
Heh heh. How many times have you used the phrase "these people", Lith?
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Lith: "I'm shocked these people are so overtly sexist and racist"
Lith: "I'm betting most of these people would be extremely happy if they just realized their frustrations were, at a core, sexual..."
Lith: "I mean, we already have ISIS....It is like these people aren't even trying anymore."
Lith: "Many of these people are being fueled by the "finding" that, and this was the headline..."
Lith: "This divide is actually IN that generation too, a lot of them deal with these people...:
Lith: "These people are yesterday's racists, now dressed up as hyper-liberals."
Lith: "...these people really don't question what they are fed through their favorite blogger do they?"
Lith: "Do these people ever stop and ponder just how dangerous this definition of harassment is?"
Lith: "It is amazing they don't realize this yet, these people think they are anti-bank, anti-corporate..."
Lith: "It's like these people have a Pavlovian response now, they don't even try to make it look like they are arguing in good faith"
Lith: "(Multiple organizations telling these people to fuck off)"
Lith: "See, the issue with this is that these people create controversy if you don't give it to them."
Nope! No "tribe" mentality here!
Ooh, here's a fun quote:
Lith: "I never think groups are all one identity--in fact, I generally dislike using groups to talk about anyone because they fall well short of being properly descriptive of individuals."
All coming from the same guy who had to bend time and space to awkwardly accuse some anti-hate speech journalist of hypocrisy. Incredible.
Lith: "I'm betting most of these people would be extremely happy if they just realized their frustrations were, at a core, sexual..."
Lith: "I mean, we already have ISIS....It is like these people aren't even trying anymore."
Lith: "Many of these people are being fueled by the "finding" that, and this was the headline..."
Lith: "This divide is actually IN that generation too, a lot of them deal with these people...:
Lith: "These people are yesterday's racists, now dressed up as hyper-liberals."
Lith: "...these people really don't question what they are fed through their favorite blogger do they?"
Lith: "Do these people ever stop and ponder just how dangerous this definition of harassment is?"
Lith: "It is amazing they don't realize this yet, these people think they are anti-bank, anti-corporate..."
Lith: "It's like these people have a Pavlovian response now, they don't even try to make it look like they are arguing in good faith"
Lith: "(Multiple organizations telling these people to fuck off)"
Lith: "See, the issue with this is that these people create controversy if you don't give it to them."
Nope! No "tribe" mentality here!
Ooh, here's a fun quote:
Lith: "I never think groups are all one identity--in fact, I generally dislike using groups to talk about anyone because they fall well short of being properly descriptive of individuals."
All coming from the same guy who had to bend time and space to awkwardly accuse some anti-hate speech journalist of hypocrisy. Incredible.
- 19,525
- 72,216
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
lol'd hard.
Posting a woman's nudes without her permission is practically rape, A Moon Bat. There's your explanation.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Well, I suppose I can bitch and moan about how a horrible injustice has been done say "faggot" a lot...
Or I can just keep doing my thing.
Lejina: Let's do the count. Itzena, Tanooba and flower for the rabid SJW's."
Can you name me a "rabid SJW" stance I have taken?
Or I can just keep doing my thing.
Lejina: Let's do the count. Itzena, Tanooba and flower for the rabid SJW's."
Can you name me a "rabid SJW" stance I have taken?
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
- 25,946
- 113,041
In this post, it literally said it was a troll post. Literally. hah, you are getting desperate
As for the rest; the difference is Tan, most of those were in regards to specific things said, in context, by someone who claimed to be a proponent of Social Justice (And thereby self identified with an ideological position). And I was deriding those statements in a general manner in a semi-private forum, without seeking discourse or having an ethical requirement to offer it for my comments. This is far different from what Delicateflower did because he was posting literally TOO the people in the forum, and using these stereotypes to eschew any need to actually discuss matters with the people he was stereotyping. When I talk to an SJW? I do not accuse them of being an SJW and then shut down discourse with them, I don't toss their ideas JUST because they look like SJW ideas. I evaluate, and then reply to the idea itself. This is why I had civil conversations with you for nearly 6 months, despite our views being diametrically opposed. Delicate, on the other hand, his first response is to go toward the generalization to avoid discourse--and that is tribalism.
See the difference Tan? Tribalism is more than simply generalizing; it is actively working on those stereotypes to AVOID talking and interacting with people. You can stereotype all you fucking want, and not be a tribal person if you're willing to give each person a chance (Which obviously he wasn't, otherwise he'd have seen the thread has been hilariously against redpill.) The reason I posted that to him, is because he was actively using that justification to assume answers EVEN in the face of us agreeing that the guy he was upset about was a douche. His dogma was so strong that even when he got the answer he wanted, he fucking recoiled, said we were wrong and called us redpillers. THAT is tribal, that is not being able to accept an argument DUE to your stereotypes.
Like you and I tan? If you came out and said Sarkesian was talking about Hitman? I wouldn't sit here and say you're wrong, even while you agree with me....I'd simply say, in this case, hey, you're right! That is what Delicate couldn't do; he couldn't drop his preconception to see the evidence before him. That is tribalism.
So, you know, try again. One of these days you'll comphrehend nuance in something--and on that day, you'll understand why we can't let something like the Moon Landing Doubt go.
- Status