The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
I would really love to know Thunderfoot's honest opinion on creation science. Him being a liberal, I would like to think that at least he doesn't agree with that shit. Then again, he did side with Rescorla and Dumar, so...
I think you mean Moonbat lol.

You must be tired bro.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
So Tanoomba, when Thunderfoot spent over two years debunking Kent Hovind and Ray Comfort and people like Nephilimfree and VenomFangX on youtube, was that just him being "merely a provocateaur opportunist who knows how to rile the masses" or was that legitimate criticism he was engaged in?

Never mind, don't bother responding, no one cares about your opinion on Thunderfoot actually.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
How many academic papers has Anita published Tanoomba?

How many times have they been cited? What's her impact rating versus Thunderfoots?

Do you know? Can you tell us?

Why are you such a fucking worthless shit stain retard?
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
It really has to burn Tanoomba's ass that thunderfoot's video on Hitman and Solar roadways really did alot to show people the silliness of both of those videos.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
He needs to man the fuck up and admit that he didn't even know who Thunderfoot is to make statements like calling him "just a provocateaur" and shit.

Pure fucking projection. The provocateaur is your little cunny slut Anita, Tanoomba. Everything you said about Phil Mason applies exclusively to your little white knight obsession. You fucking ridiculous chuckle fuck piece of shit.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Here's Sarkeesian's educational background and research credentials

Background
Sarkeesian grew up near Toronto. Her parents are Armenians from Iraq who emigrated to Canada in the 1970s.[2][3] She later moved to California, and identifies as Canadian-American.[3][4][5] She received a bachelor's degree in communication studies from California State University, Northridge, and then earned a master's degree in social and political thought from York University, graduating in 2010. Her master's thesis is titled I'll Make a Man Out of You: Strong Women in Science Fiction and Fantasy Television.[6][7]

Bachelor's degree in Communications. Which isn't even a real degree.

Master's degree in social and political thought.

Which also isn't even a real degree.

Versus PhD in Chemistry with a focus in Biochemistry and 34 published works, with research and work experience at fucking Cornell.

Eat a fucking gallon of dicks you atrociously myopic pedantic little white knighting twerp.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
For shits and giggles, let's dig up a few more definitions of "harass/harassment" (in the order they appear when Googling "harassment").

thefreedictionary.com
"harass: To subject (another) to hostile or prejudicial remarks or actions; pressure or intimidate."

www.merriam-webster.com
"harass: to annoy or bother (someone) in a constant or repeated way"

www.vocabulary.com
"harassment: the act of tormenting by continued persistent attacks and criticism"

www.oxforddictionaries.com/
"harassment: Aggressive pressure or intimidation"

www.macmillandictionary.com/
"harassment: annoying or unpleasant behaviour towards someone that takes place regularly"



These all seem pretty consistent, and they certainly fit what Sarkeesian was talking about. Is there any particular reason the original definition I quoted was brought into question? Is there any particular reason I was (once again) falsely accused of "redefining words"? I'm just kidding. I know damn well the answers to these questions already.
 

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,041
So, let me get this straight: Context doesn't matter after all? That's what you're telling me now? The actual reality of the situation (that Stewart's work doesn't lead to harassment spikes while Thunderf00t's does, that Thunderf00t is neither a comedian nor a satirist but merely a provocateaur opportunist who knows how to rile the masses) doesn't mean shit, apparently, as long as you could draw some arbitrary parallel between two vastly different people "discussing a public figure" (for what that's worth). Somehow, SOMEHOW, I'm still the troll. Go figure.
How do you know Stewarts work doesn't lead to harassment Tan? I offered MORE evidence than you did about TF supporting that correlation. I showed you a News report from Palin's security team, during the blood libel back lash, where they stated harassment had increased, in addition, if you dig, the FBI made the same statement. You can also check out the Daily show in 2010 if you feel up to it and fine plenty of Stewart videos on it. So we have Stewart making videos mocking Palin (Which is was vicious about) and then Palin getting a measurable increase in threats.

There is actually documentation of the Stewart/Palin correlation.

YOU though, have nothing--you CLAIM Sarkesian gets more threats, but Sark doesn't have a security team (She gets bodyguards are certain venues). The only comment the FBI ever made was that a threat had nothing to do with TF, or anyone, and wasn't credible; they never commented on any increase in threats. You literally just claimed her threats increased when TF posts a video, with no evidence that such a thing even happens. But lets say it does happen (Lets be generous), then guess what? Your evidence is EXACTLY the same as mine. EXACTLY. We are both offering a media personality, lampooning someone who is being critical of something else (Sark video games and now even politics, and Palin on Politics.) and then a claim that harassment rises during that time.

That is all you have--that is the basis of your conjecture. So you tell me what context I'm missing. What evidence of this causation do you have? Tweets with TFs name? You realize the Daily show made numerous hash tags over the blood libel stuff. So what do you have, Tan? That's right, you don't have anything that differentiates them; Thudnerfoot is a well known satirists with a large audience, as is Stewart, they both poke fun at women engaged in politics, and women who lead very public lives. Both of them happened to poke fun at these women during times when twitter was "harassing them", neither guy ordered or requested this.

In every metric, John Stewart harassed Palin, according to you. You can't admit how retarded that is, because you're a troll. Really all there is to it.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
By any definition of harassment that would require legal action against Thunderfoot, it would most surely fit stuff like the Daily Show. You must see this, surely? You can't just handwave it away by saying one is a satirist. Would you want a world where someone's free speech was dependent on whether he counted under some definition of a comedian?

Thunderfoot has never, not even once, advocated any sort of violence that I have seen. Until you have some of that, shut the fuck up.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Tanoomba, do you really believe the world would be a better place if Anita was able to shut down Thunderfoot's video? Mind you, to do that you would have to create a legal framework such that it couldn't be "abused" by bad people like Sarah Palin.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Is the idiot Moon Bat going to address the fact that everything he called Thunderfoot only applies to Anita?

Can he address the total lack of credibility or credentials of merit or worth on Anita's part?

Can he do anything but keep regurgitating his already disproven argument based on flawed etymology?

How is Thunderfoot a professional provocateaur, but Sarkeesian isn't?

Sarkeesian's ENTIRE CAREER is based on creating PROVOCATIVE VIDEOS CRITICIZING media and media figures and products.

Thunderfoot's HOBBY is making videos exposing the whackiness of crappy unfounded and unevidenced belief systems.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Woah there, Lith. There's a LOT wrong with you post, but let's do one thing at a time.

First of all, you expressed concerns about "my" definition of harassment. I have provided you with the source of said definition as well as many more definitions that seem to say the same thing. Do you still have a rpoblem with these definitions or can we agree that they are acceptable? (I promise I'll get back to correcting everything you got wrong in your last post soon eough.)
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Still can't simply address the fact that Sarkeesian is the professional provocateaur, while Phil Mason is a PhD holding published chemist who just makes youtube videos critical of ridiculous belief systems as a hobby.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
I really don't get what kind of legal framework Tanoomba wants to live under. Does he really want to ban things like the Daily Show and Charlie Hebdo? That would be the effect of any legislation that would target someone like Thunderfoot. Or does he think that the only people that should be allowed satire are people that do it fulltime? Do people need to become "registered" satirists before they are allowed to criticize people he likes?
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
56,318
140,079
nah he's got a gut feeling for what is and isn't "legitimate" so it's alright
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
I really don't get what kind of legal framework Tanoomba wants to live under. Does he really want to ban things like the Daily Show and Charlie Hebdo? That would be the effect of any legislation that would target someone like Thunderfoot. Or does he think that the only people that should be allowed satire are people that do it fulltime? Do people need to become "registered" satirists before they are allowed to criticize people he likes?
The legal framework A Moon Bat wishes to live under can best be described as

"Ban all the things I don't like"
"Promote all the things I do like"
 

lurkingdirk

AssHat Taint
<Medals Crew>
51,357
250,436
A Moon Bat, how many dicks are in a gallon of dicks, and how does that number change when you compare said bucket in South East Asia as compared to North America?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.