Here's the video he's referencing, but abjectly refuses to link.
If you watch it, in no way is Thunderfoot slandering her, he is offering his refutation of her claims. He is not personally attacking her, lying about her, engaging in egregious personal attacks, etc.
He is perfectly rational, calm, level headed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuRSaLZidWI&ab_channel=Thunderf00t
Tanoomba's argument is that if you disagree with his/Anita's opinion, then BY DEFINITION, you're engaging in egregious personal attacks on her/him.
It is the perfect microcosm of his closed minded inability to represent anyone on the opposing aisle as engaging in fair criticism. He must always assume bad faith, and assert bad faith.
Even if you DISAGREE with Thunderfoot's opinion in this video, you cannot remotely describe him as engaging in egregious personal attacks, lies, or attempting to destroy anyone's reputation.
This is literally the "If you criticize them at all, you're a rapist sexist homophobe woman hater by definition" argument, and nothing else.
If you watch it, in no way is Thunderfoot slandering her, he is offering his refutation of her claims. He is not personally attacking her, lying about her, engaging in egregious personal attacks, etc.
He is perfectly rational, calm, level headed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuRSaLZidWI&ab_channel=Thunderf00t
Tanoomba's argument is that if you disagree with his/Anita's opinion, then BY DEFINITION, you're engaging in egregious personal attacks on her/him.
It is the perfect microcosm of his closed minded inability to represent anyone on the opposing aisle as engaging in fair criticism. He must always assume bad faith, and assert bad faith.
Even if you DISAGREE with Thunderfoot's opinion in this video, you cannot remotely describe him as engaging in egregious personal attacks, lies, or attempting to destroy anyone's reputation.
This is literally the "If you criticize them at all, you're a rapist sexist homophobe woman hater by definition" argument, and nothing else.