The only elephant in this room is your clear hypocrisy and this transparent attempt to deflect.
Let's really acknowledge the elephant in the room.Shall we acknowledge the elephant in the room?
Does anybody even have the will, the talent, the fundsandthe time to create something that will stand on its own as worthy of attention while simultaneously mocking people? That shit ain't easy. Don't go all "But they're gonna get me!" when what you mean to say is "Entertaining people is hard."
Holy sweet Jesus, has anybody ever suggested otherwiseever?Where do you evengetthis stuff?Fair point. I don't think you'd term murder and terrorism as acceptable societal backlash though, so we're in agreement.
OK, so, because I am the only person on this board apparently obligated to address every post directed at me, I also often get shit on fordoing exactly that. So forgive me if I missed my cue.The only elephant in this room is your clear hypocrisy and this transparent attempt to deflect.
The medium is the message.Videos of her whining? That's a difference in medium, not content. Your advice applies exactly equally to her.
If you're not even going to try I'll just excuse myself now.
Said literally nobody ever.THEY WERE ASKING FOR IT! They drew the cartoons!
Did you not notice who made that accusation? Didn't work out too well for him last time.Tanoomba alt confirmed.
You feeling obligated to respond to every post directed at you is a massive red flag to begin with, and that partially explains why people shit all over you.OK, so, because I am the only person on this board apparently obligated to address every post directed at me, I also often get shit on fordoing exactly that.
I don't "feel" obligated, dude. I just get yelled at and accused of "ignoring information" and "dodging questions" if I don't. On the other hand, Doc felt free to ignore my reasonable and relevant question when he realized he couldn't answer it. It's a silly double standard and I called it out, that's all.You feeling obligated to respond to every post directed at you is a massive red flag to begin with, and that partially explains why people shit all over you.
Jesus you're a pussy.I don't "feel" obligated, dude. I just get yelled at and accused of "ignoring information" and "dodging questions" if I don't. On the other hand, Doc felt free to ignore my reasonable and relevant question when he realized he couldn't answer it. It's a silly double standard and I called it out, that's all.
"WHY DIDN'T YOU ANSWER ME? YOU'RE A HYPOCRITE WHO DEFLECTS!"Jesus you're a pussy.
You made a false equivalence between Sarkeesian's work and your message board bitching. I pointed out that she actually produced something of merit, a work that is worthy of attention.You didn't answer anything. You posted a link to a Wikipedia article. I ignored your question because I don't care to answer it. You can just reread your posts about Charlie hebdo and Pam whatshername and all the responses you got if you're interested in having that conversation again. I'm not.
We fundamentally disagree. I don't find her work any more meritorious than a forum post, and I've read plenty of posts on this forum that far more well researched than her shit videos. Obviously this conversation will go no where.You made a false equivalence between Sarkeesian's work and your message board bitching. I pointed out that she actually produced something of merit, a work that is worthy of attention.
But somebody might yell at himTanoomba, you really shouldn't feel obligated to respond to every post
I don't really feel obligated (as I've already said), I'm just pointing out the double standard. If I ask a question and it's ignored, it's because "nobody cares" or "didn't read" or "it's not worth engaging you" or what have you. If I, who often have to defend myself from multiple people at the same time, don't address a specific post, it's because I'm "ignoring information" or "dodging the question".Tanoomba, you really shouldn't feel obligated to respond to every post