The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.
- Thread starter hodj
- Start date
- Status
radditsu
Silver Knight of the Realm
- 4,676
- 826
Hodj has posted it over and over. You won't get me to argue semantics with you, you fucking cunt.
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
For one thing, Jhodi never posted any proof. Ho posted what he perceived to be evidence. Big difference there.
Secondly: Semantics? You're joking, right?
What the fuck does semantics have to do with this:
None of those are semantics arguments, you moron. They are all actual flaws in Jhodi's arguments (that he is too much of a coward to acknowledge).
So I ask you again, did YOU find any proof? Jhodi didn't. Did YOU?
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
This invite is open to anyone, by the way.
Jhodi failed to back up his argument and has committed himself to "full troll" mode now (see posts above and below). If anybody else would either like to present proof that Jhodi hasn't mentioned, or attempt to explain the holes in his logic (you've got a lot to choose from), you are more than welcome.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Your fallacy is appeal to majority.
And since that majority hasn't actually spoken, your fallacy is appeal to delusion (which seems to be one of your favorites).
Also, you claim "No one cares" and yet you are completely incapable of not continuing your troll job, WELL AFTER you have ceased to have anything to add. What are you trying to accomplish now?
We get it: You think you won. In a spectacular display of willful ignorance, you managed to tune out the massive problems with your argument in order to come to a false conclusion you are presenting as self-evident (despite literally all the facts showing otherwise). What else is new? Jhodi gonna Jhodi.
At this point, I legit want to see if anybody else can put up a better effort that you have. Most posters here believe Sulkowicz was lying. I sincerely would like to know if any of them are confident enough in their conclusion to see if it stands up to scrutiny. If they believe they have seen proof that she is lying, I would love to know what that proof is. If they think I have misrepresented your own version of the "evidence", I'd love to hear the logic behind that too. If no one actually cares, then the results of our debate stand: That we don't know what happened with Sulkowicz, and that there is no proof that she told the truth/lied about being raped.
Your work here is done. I relieve you of your responsibilities as a low-tier troll. I promise you, I and everyone else who reads this thread will mentally insert your copy-paste after every one of my posts. You have nothing left to say and you are accomplishing nothing with your, frankly, amateur troll shitposts. Go, now, and be free.
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
All dat typing.
All that desperate pleading to restart a debate you already lost.
All that hoping someone, anyone, will give you the time of day.
All for nothing.
Your attempt to restart a debate you already lost yesterday has failed.
Please try again tomorrow.
All that desperate pleading to restart a debate you already lost.
All that hoping someone, anyone, will give you the time of day.
All for nothing.
Your attempt to restart a debate you already lost yesterday has failed.
Please try again tomorrow.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Jhodi, if I thought there was any chance that telling you to watch your behavior in the Ask Amod thread would prevent you from crossing a line and getting yourself RRPed, I wouldn't even mention it at all. However, it's pretty clear that you have zero self-control and are about to force a mod's hand again. I eagerly anticipate the results.
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
OK, shut the fuck up for two seconds, Jhodi. I'd like to hear from someone who's not a troll and your OCD is interfering with that.
OPEN CHALLENGE!!
It's no secret that "Emma Sulkowicz (aka Mattress Girl) lied about being raped" is a popular narrative here. I question the confidence put into this narrative as there is no proof (aka "hard evidence") that supports it. It seems very clear that the only rational conclusion to draw in this particular situation is "We don't know whether or not Sulkowicz was raped", and yet many are averse to (even offended by) this fact-based assessment.
HEREis where you can find pretty much all the facts that have ever been published about the case, in chronological order. It is presented objectively and doesn't accommodate a specific narrative.
If you believe you found proof that Sulkowicz lied about being raped, please present it here for scrutiny.
If, like Jhodi, you can acknowledge that there is no proof but insist that the available evidence is conclusive anyway, please be ready to defend any fallacies or problems in your deductive logic (that's where Jhodi gave up, maybe you can do better).
To give you a leg up, here is what Jhodi considers to be evidence that Sulkowicz lied about being raped: (spoilered for length)
Here are just some of the problems with Jhodi's argument:
If you think you can succeed where Jhodi failed,now is your chanceto take Tanoomba down a peg!
OPEN CHALLENGE!!
It's no secret that "Emma Sulkowicz (aka Mattress Girl) lied about being raped" is a popular narrative here. I question the confidence put into this narrative as there is no proof (aka "hard evidence") that supports it. It seems very clear that the only rational conclusion to draw in this particular situation is "We don't know whether or not Sulkowicz was raped", and yet many are averse to (even offended by) this fact-based assessment.
HEREis where you can find pretty much all the facts that have ever been published about the case, in chronological order. It is presented objectively and doesn't accommodate a specific narrative.
If you believe you found proof that Sulkowicz lied about being raped, please present it here for scrutiny.
If, like Jhodi, you can acknowledge that there is no proof but insist that the available evidence is conclusive anyway, please be ready to defend any fallacies or problems in your deductive logic (that's where Jhodi gave up, maybe you can do better).
To give you a leg up, here is what Jhodi considers to be evidence that Sulkowicz lied about being raped: (spoilered for length)
Also, the reason he believes this evidence to be conclusive despite it literally being the opposite is because his religion tells him his conclusion is "more reasonable".
Here are just some of the problems with Jhodi's argument:
If you think you can succeed where Jhodi failed,now is your chanceto take Tanoomba down a peg!
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
ahem
Its only 6 lines. I'm almost certain you can read and comprehend what they mean.
Almost.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
*sigh*
Your trolling is terrible. Take a break. You are not obligated to respond to every post I make. Tell your fucking kids you love them, for Christ's sake.
Speaking of which, I'm curious: Are your kids home-schooled because of a learning disability or because of behavioral problems? They could easily have inherited either (or both) from you, so if you don't consider it prying, I'd really like to know. You know, since I'm an educator and all.
Your trolling is terrible. Take a break. You are not obligated to respond to every post I make. Tell your fucking kids you love them, for Christ's sake.
Speaking of which, I'm curious: Are your kids home-schooled because of a learning disability or because of behavioral problems? They could easily have inherited either (or both) from you, so if you don't consider it prying, I'd really like to know. You know, since I'm an educator and all.
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
- Status