Well, the problem with your scenario is that you also managed to take all the facts out of it also.Why not take race out of it and ask if it is ok for some retard to track someone else down and shoot them dead after accosting them and losing a short fight.
Which facts are those? I'm not actually following this case.Well, the problem with your scenario is that you also managed to take all the facts out of it also.
Then don't comment on it like you know whats going on. Watch this live stream and come on in for the big win!Which facts are those? I'm not actually following this case.
Well how utterly racist he was, for starters. Sitting there in his car, being racist.Which facts are those? I'm not actually following this case.
Seriously, they might not.Right now, the prosecution is playing the Zimmerman police interview from the night of the incident. Zimmerman's basically giving his entire testimony, to the jury, without the capacity to be cross examined. Its like the prosecution literally don't want to win this case.
But he did stalk him. He was following him for no reason other than he was a paranoid wanna be cop. Granted we don't know if he touched, or grabbed, or approached the kid menacingly before he got his ass kicked, but getting a little roughed up for being stupid doesn't warrant a right to kill.Well how utterly racist he was, for starters. Sitting there in his car, being racist.
But yeah, those things didn't happen. He didn't stalk him or accost him.