The Paranormal, UFO's, and Mysteries of the Unknown

Lumi

Vyemm Raider
4,074
2,806
i take it Shyv watched too much Dark City as a kid.

Hmm was born in 1982 and some how never even heard of this movie. Just looked it up and it actually looks pretty sweet. Will definitely watch it. Thanks~
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
You have to find a way inside a black hole to time travel.

All causality is spatially connected at a radius inside those things. You can go backward in time, there.

Of course, it's equally likely that inside those things simply does not exist.
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,642
212,864
Hmm was born in 1982 and some how never even heard of this movie. Just looked it up and it actually looks pretty sweet. Will definitely watch it. Thanks~
its absolutely incredible. but please for the love of Xenu, dont mention my name when you write your manifesto.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 users

Lumi

Vyemm Raider
4,074
2,806
You have to find a way inside a black hole to time travel.

All causality is spatially connected at a radius inside those things. You can go backward in time, there.

Of course, it's equally likely that inside those things simply does not exist.

Black holes have never been proven to exist. They're science fiction.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,642
212,864
No, those are actually real meteors. Notice how they are nothing like the Russian one though? They're not lighting up the entire sky or exploding or even coming remotely close.
those are small particles falling to earth, it happens every year. there was a TV show several years ago called Meteor Men and it was two dudes going across the US to collect ancient meteroites. i really dont know why you arent on board with this. Meteors are not something only found in a textbook. its an actual thing, the meteor that hit in that video i linked was a major event, and even then it was just a small one that didnt burn up.

i mean come one. this was what happened in tunguska over a hundred years ago.
images

xkh376v7-1372241498.jpg

SiberianTimes.jpg

no missiles and evidence of meteroites was found at that location.
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,306
-2,239
How am I a troll? I'm simply stating the truth. Time doesn't physically exist and therefor cannot be traveled through nor upon. What don't you get exactly and how is this in anyway trolling? Time is merely a man made concept. Water physically exists and therefor you can travel upon it. Land physically exists and therefor can travel upon it. Air physically exists and therefor can be traveled upon. Time? Where do you see time exactly? How do you travel through a conceptual idea? Is it really 2018 or is this just an arbitrary man made number?

i'll play along, but i'm really sure you're a troll

anyway, yes, you can't literally travel through time. however, the phrase "time travel" is a misnomer, specifically the use of the word "travel." "time dilation" is the more accurate phrase. and time dilation definitely exists. its why GPS satellites have to adjust their clock by 0.0007 seconds every year.

but you're gonna tell me space isn't real, right?
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Lumi

Vyemm Raider
4,074
2,806
those are small particles falling to earth, it happens every year. there was a TV show several years ago called Meteor Men and it was two dudes going across the US to collect ancient meteroites. i really dont know why you arent on board with this. Meteors are not something only found in a textbook. its an actual thing, the meteor that hit in that video i linked was a major event, and even then it was just a small one that didnt burn up.

i mean come one. this was what happened in tunguska over a hundred years ago.

no missiles and evidence of meteroites was found at that location.

The Tunguska explosion is highly controversial. Nobody knows what caused it. You would expect there to be a pretty massive object at the center of that explosion. There's really no actual evidence that whatever hit in Russia was a meteor, just speculation. The angle in which it appears to enter view from the atmosphere looks like it was fired from somewhere like a missile would be.
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,642
212,864
The Tunguska explosion is highly controversial. Nobody knows what caused it. You would expect there to be a pretty massive object at the center of that explosion. There's really no actual evidence that whatever hit in Russia was a meteor, just speculation. The angle in which it appears to enter view from the atmosphere looks like it was fired from somewhere like a missile would be.
alright, i dont want to be pushy, believe what you like, all are welcome here. but please share some videos too.
 

Lumi

Vyemm Raider
4,074
2,806
i'll play along, but i'm really sure you're a troll

anyway, yes, you can't literally travel through time. however, the phrase "time travel" is a misnomer, specifically the use of the word "travel." "time dilation" is the more accurate phrase. and time dilation definitely exists. its why GPS satellites have to adjust their clock by 0.0007 seconds every year.

but you're gonna tell me space isn't real, right?

Sure, I can agree that time dilation exists but it's not like the GPS satellite is existing in a different moment of time than everything else. Merely the device that is calculating the time is becoming distorted somehow. The only concept of time travel that makes sense is something like cryogenics but then that's not really time traveling that's just time extending. If you're 30 now and some how they invented some way to cryogenically freeze you for 100 years, you'd still be 130 when you woke up. The type of time travel you see in movies is impossible. Even the time dilation in the movie Interstellar is impossible.

As for space, it exists sure but the Star Trek idea of space does not. That's the science fiction part.
 
  • 2Pants on Fire!
Reactions: 1 users

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,642
212,864
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1WTF
Reactions: 1 users

a_skeleton_05

<Banned>
13,843
34,508
Forward time travel as normally seen is probably impossible, but on an individual level if you can place the body in uninterruptible stasis without effect on the body, the individual wouldn't be able to tell the difference between it and instantaneous time-travel.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Caliane

Golden Baronet of the Realm
14,523
9,998
Exactly. The material and process that enables the 90% loss of gravity on the vessels effectively removes these things from earth's gravity. Including those within. I have never read specifics from any whistleblower or insider that have revealed how they figured out how to Not turn the pilots into soup under those conditions.
ok. you wrote that entirely too seriously. I can't tell if you are joking.
Gravity and inertia are not the same thing, or related in any way.