Search results

I know you're in love with this "creationist" narrative, but that's exactly your problem. You commit yourself so wholeheartedly to false narratives that you go out of your way to put square pegs into round holes to make them work. I never said "If you don't have 100% certainty, then anything...

Hey Jhodi, I demonstrated you lied about me repeatedly in this and other threads when you claimed I claimed Sulkowicz was raped. Would you care to please link one of these supposed posts where I made said claim? You can't and won't because you're a lying piece of shit. Just fyi.

There's no contradiction there whatsoever. Again (again, again, again): "I believe there's a decent chance she's telling the truth." DOES NOT EQUAL "She was raped." The former is an opinion that requires no proof and counts for nothing in a debate because, again, it's a personal...

Obviously. WE DON'T KNOW if she was raped. WE DON'T KNOW if she was telling the truth. There's no conclusive evidence either way. That's a FACT.

"You don't support your stances with evidence!" (Posts a ton of evidence to back up my stance) "Didn't read hurr durr durrrrrrr" #justjhodithings

I believe there's a decent chance she was telling the truth.

Again (again, again), "I think there's a decent chance she's telling the truth." =/= "She was raped." One is a personal opinion that requires no proof, the other is a claim that requires proof in order to be valid. In fact, here I am also NOT claiming she'd been raped: Here I am...

HYPOCRISY OVERLOAD How pathetic is it that Jhodi is in here literally literally making up accusations against me that are completely and totally false. He's free to link any of the posts where I claimed Emma Sulkowicz was raped at any time.

Know what's even more ironic? Stating a personal opinion about the likelihood of an event automatically equals making positive claims about that event. "Good enough for thee, but not for me."

Funny, you've never shied from insults that don't accurately describe the person you're insulting. "Good enough for thee, but not for me."

I never said this. More lies.

Did I ever claim Emma was raped, yes or no? "Didn't read" (Because Jhodi knows the answer is "No" and is a coward.) It's easy to claim victory when you completely ignore all the facts that prove you wrong.

No, I said I didn't claim she was raped, and that's a fact. You really don't understand how English works, do you? Figured out how to shut me down? Your go-to response is "didn't read". That's not a shut down, that's an admission of defeat. You're a pathetic, weak-willed simpleton who bullies...

What's the matter? Scared you might be held accountable for your words?

I claimed that you ignore information that contradicts your narrative. I have provided solid proof of such. In fact, this very conversation is further proof of that. I claimed you were a liar. I provided solid proof of that too, using your own words which were proven false. You're wrong and...

Stop twisting the narrative to lies to suit your needs. You made explicit claims. I can prove them wrong. It's that simple.

Did I ever claim Emma was raped, yes or no?

Wow. Holy shit, you're a coward.

And a colossal fucking hypocrite.

And everyone knows it.

Wait a second, Jhodi, let's clarify some things if we're going to be serious about this: Of the many bullshit claims you make in this post: Is the explicit claim that "You've never presented a shred of credible evidence for your points of view. Ever. Not a single fucking time. You cannot...

Hey, I'm ready to put my money where my mouth is. Your the coward who's hiding behind your hollow words instead of putting them to the test.

I post here because this is the only place I don't get punished for other people's posts. You didn't answer my question: Ready for your new avatar, bitch?

The first, I've done many times over. The second was never part of any claim I've ever made. Ready for your new avatar, bitch?

Looks like I've got my very own stalker.

Thanks, Gerb, for reminding me why Khal is on ignore. (Everything he said I have already addressed, in case you didn't notice.)

Hi, I'm Tanoomba. Nice to meet you.

That actually does sound pretty awesome.

Everything you just described is based on stereotypes of the French from France, not on French Canadians. I'm not even a French Canadian, but that's one of my pet peeves.

Underground, no less.

Gosh, still single.

Just to clarify, I'm not assigning any inherent value to "being offended". If people get offended at a joke, I don't think action needs to be taken to appease said offense. Having said that, I'm a little surprised at the audacity displayed here by people who seem to be attempting to define...

I never claimed it wasn't the offended people's problem, nor did I claim that Sargon owes them anything. But if you make jokes about raping public figures (sorry,notraping public figures), it's a damn near guarantee that people are going to be upset, and not without reason. A reasonable...

It certainly is.

Wizards did it.

I guess you didn't notice how confused his mom was, because saying you wouldn't rape a specific person is fucking weird, and understandably off-putting. Sargon and you are using literal grade school logic ("But mom, I said Iwouldn'trape her!") to try to play it off as ridiculous people getting...

Careful, Jhodi, you've got a bit of happiness spittle on your chin there. And is that a puddle of joy urine forming around your ankles?

"I'M HAPPY GODDAMMIT!!! HAPPY, I TELL YOU!!!"