Search results

You're a sick person, Jhodi. In every sense of the word.

You're disgusting. Somebody needs to call child protective services if you're teaching your kids to suggest suicide to people who make them look stupid.

How so? I'm not making a claim, like Cad just did. I'm saying we don't know, we will never know, and for what it's worth (which, again, isnothing), it seems more likely to me that she is telling the truth. There is no contradiction there.

This man is raising children. They would be so proud.

*sigh* Yes, Lithose, when me and my drunk buddies watched moon landing conspiracy videos at their request, I was suckered. When I realized there was a ton more information that needed to be looked into before coming to a conclusion, I decided to stick with "I don't know" because I DON'T...

Many mistakes in that post, friend. Yes, one of them is lying. NO, we don't know which. What makes you think we need to come to a conclusion? "We don't know" is not a middle ground, it is a statement of fact. There simply isn't any conclusive evidence either way. It's foolish to try to draw...

Most graves don't need to be deeper than 6 feet, but Jhodi's been digging so long and so hard that he's hitting magma.

There's no revision of anything. That's what my stance has always been, and every post I've made on the topic backs that up. What part of my argument is flawed? I just showed it to you again, and it has never changed. There are no flaws I can see, every part of my stance is logistically sound...

Here's my stance again, same as it ever was, broken down into handy bite-size morsels: - We DON'T KNOW whether Sulkowicz was raped. - There is no hard evidence that proves Sulkowicz was raped. - There is no hard evidence that proves Solkowicz was lying. - There is reasonable doubt she...

Here's what happened in this thread: You made a false claim as to what my stance was. For the third day in a row, I'm still pointing this out to you. It has yet to get through your remarkably thick skull. But it's OK. All you have to do is tell me whatever it is you think I'm wrong...

No, Jhodi, what I'm attempting to do is communicate what my actual stance is and has always been., since you seem to have tremendous difficulty grasping it This is backed up by every post I have made on this subject. I have never shifted goal posts or pretended I didn't say something that I did...

Jhodi, I can't be any clearer with you. I have stated and re-stated my actual stance many times over. What problem do you have with it? What do you want me to reformulate? I'm legitimately asking here.

"More likely than not, IMHO." Satisfied?

I did no such thing and, as usual, you can't back up this statement with anything other than hollow rhetoric. Here: What part of that is wrong?

No, you just spent forty pages explaining how something I've never said is wrong. I explained my stance yet again to you. If you can't tell me how any of it is wrong, we're done. If you can't tell me what you think it is I'm wrong about, we're done.

Sure, bro. I'll get back to you as soon as you can tell me what I'm wrong about. I honestly don't know what you think my argument is. I've clarified my position yet again and gotten "Didn't read", so all I'm hearing is you repeating delusional and desperate false narratives that you refuse to...

See? You make this claim and back it up by nothing. When did I say two plus two equals five? Why do you refuse to ever address what I'm actually saying?

Who cares? I've said repeatedly that our personal beliefs mean fuck all. All that matters is what can be proven. Unfortunately, in this case nothing has been (or likely ever will be) proven. Why is it so important to dwell on what I see as a likely scenario? I listed the reasons why I see it...

Reformulate WHAT? Jesus Christ.

I know my own arguments very well. Let's recap: - We DON'T KNOW whether Sulkowicz was raped. That's a FACT. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that because I'm not. - There is no hard evidence that proves Sulkowicz was raped. That's a FACT. I'm not going to admit I'm wrong about that...

(See, Fanaskin? this is exactly what that picture describes. Jhodi decides on arbitrary rules that, by design, dismiss the actual point, in order to "choose his own adventure". It is incredibly dishonest and I'm honestly shocked you don't see it.)

WHAT ARGUMENT? I've clarified my stance a thousand times. What the fuck are you even asking for?

I don't believe that at all. I have objectively proven your claims about my stance wrong. You have not countered with even a speck of evidence that supports what you state I have claimed. No amount of reality-twisting mental gymnastics will change that, Jhodi.

As usual, you talk the talk but don't walk the walk. Fucking quote me expressing the stance you believe I have taken. (I honestly don't even know what that might be any more, as I've already proven your initial claim false.) Put up or shut up.

Why would I have a rebuttal for a stance I never took? I'm not going to argue a stance that you insist I've taken, despite never taking that stance and you being unable to actually quote me ever taking that stance. Are you really this retarded? I mean, seriously?

It has happened repeatedly. But don't take my word for it, it's all still there in black and white. Facts don't lie.

Actually, Jhodi, you haven't cited me once. Not once. I corrected you the very first time you misrepresented me. I have proven, beyond the shadow of any doubt, that I have never taken the stance you attributed to me. I practically begged you to quote me expressing what you state I claimed...

Yes, congratulations on your victory against an imaginary opponent who believes whatever you make up for him. Great job.

Here's what I noticed: Every time, or damn near every time, somebody tries to argue with me about something, they end up arguing against something I've never said. Oh, theybelievethey are addressing my actual stance, to be sure, but confirmation bias and groupthink distort their ability to...

Dude, you've been making big claims about my stance for days. What the fuck do you think my stance is? The closest I can guess is "Emma was raped", which I have proven many times over is not and has never been my stance. Yet, you seem to be under the impression that you are still arguing against...

So you're just ignoring all the reasons why it's perfectly reasonable to believe she might not be lying? How convenient.

So, yet again, Jhodi refuses to even clarify what the fuck he's talking about. More spineless cowardice from someone who put his foot in his mouth on day one and has been trying to re-write the rules of reality to try to save face ever since.

Me: We don't know whether Sulkowicz was raped. (This is a fact.) I personally believe there's a decent chance she's telling the truth. Here's all the circumstantial evidence that led me to believe that. Having said that, our personal beliefs don't count for anything. All that counts is what can...

It's not resetting anything. You've spent the last three days arguing against a stance I have never taken and tuning out the mountains of evidence that prove that was never my stance. It's really easy to win arguments when you make up your opponent's stance. Heck, I just killed 3 dragons...

Why don't you tell me what you actually think my stance is?

Hey Jhodi, all this talk about my stance, why don't you tell me what you actually think my stance is?

Jhodi: "Your claim that the sky is green is incorrect. Provide evidence of this claim or admit you are wrong." Tan: "I never claimed the sky was green." Jhodi: "Did you get that proof yet? You're a creationist." Tan: "I never claimed the sky was green. Can you show where I have?"...

See, here's what you don't get: I never claimed "Emma was raped". Your entire stance is based on a claim I've never made. When you understand that, we might actually have something to discuss.

No, YOUR argument (that you made up for me) has been destroyed. When you're ready to address anything I've ever actually said, I'll be waiting. LOL at "everyone knows it". You are the very height of arrogance, Jhodi. Apparently you didn't learn your lesson after your hubris led to your...

Oh, they'll laugh regardless. It has nothing to do with me being wrong, nor has it ever. Knock yourself out. I have already explained why your analogy doesn't fit at all but, as usual, you are tuning out any and all information that doesn't suit your narrative. You know, like creationists do...