Search results

No, Jhodi, I will not. You're making claims (not just expressing you opinion) that aren't backed up by facts. I will rub your nose in it until you understand not to shit on the living room rug any more.

Let's hope you can be a little more reasonable than Jhodi. - The kangaroo court did not find she was most likely not raped. They found there was insufficient evidence to hold Nungesser responsible. That is an altogether different from saying they found evidence she was lying, which is how...

And yet YOU believe the positive claim that Sulkowicz lied about being raped, despite there being no conclusive evidence that supports that. It has been demonstrated that the broken position you made up for me is founded in faulty reasoning, yes. You have yet to actually address anything I've...

Found in the politics thread, perfect representation of Jhodi's "technique":

No. Your assumption that anything I have to say is influenced by the gender of whoever I'm talking about is sexist.

Sexist.

What did I claim is a fact that is not a fact? Jesus Christ, dude, make a fucking statement.

I ignored nothing. Name me one fact I've ignored. Also, why aren't you calling Jhodi out on the facts he's ignoring? He's open and brazen about it, too. It doesn't get more direct than "Didn't read".

Wait... but "Didn't read" counts as facts and proof?

You got it, Err. I bet Jhodi's wearing pink pants now, too.

If you make up my argument, I will call you on it. Why would you expect otherwise?

Reminds me of a local bank where the ATMs used to have monitors over them. At night, they would regularly display a Windows "shutting down" screen, which was already pretty unprofessional. One night there was TeamViewer on the monitor, displaying the code that needed to be entered to access that...

You mean, the argument you made up for me.

I do take comfort that I am not the only person people can only argue against by relying on silly straw men.

Another Jhodi psychotic meltdown.

Therein lies your problem. You think you've got all the answers, but you've got shit. You stubbornly refuse to even acknowledge information that doesn't suit your narrative. You can't possibly win with that mindset. Ever. Nothing to fix. You made up a bunch of bullshit, tuned everything else...

Dude, you're trying to win an argument against a stance I never took. Congratulations on creating your own opponent in your head and winning the argument you've also created in your head. It's OK, Jhodi. You've been wrong before. You got over it then, you'll get over it again.

By the way, Jhodi, you're welcome. If it wasn't for this thread, we'd both be RRPed right now.

There's nothing to "swing out of", Jhodi. Your entire assertion of this scenario is false. I have never claimed Sulkowicz was raped. Feel free to prove me wrong by linking my post where I made this claim. If you can't do that (and you can't), you lose.

I accept your admission of defeat. Don't worry, maybe you'll get me next time. You just have to stop shutting out all information that goes against your narrative and stop lying through your teeth. That's really your Achille's heel.

Unlike, Jhodi, I've responded to every single challenge leveled at me, patiently and honestly. It's all there. As usual, you're just ignoring reality to push your narrative.

This is a lie. All of my beliefs are perfectly reasonable, and I have demonstrated such. Plenty of evidence has been presented that suggests she is not lying. You're just pretending it's not there because it doesn't suit your narrative. You know, just like creationists do. I agree. Therefore...

Holy shit, Jhodi's lost it completely.

No, you don't. I've just explained how I interpreted the available information that led me to believe there's a good chance she's telling the truth. It's not a certainty, but reasonable doubt is there.

Exactly what I was thinking.

Mist and Quaid FTW.

And yet I am the only one actually backing up my claims here.

My "stance" is WE DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. That's the WHOLE FUCKING POINT. Anything but the point. Literally anything,anythingbut the point.

Quote me claiming Emma was raped. Put up or shut up, coward.

Makes a blatantly false accusation. Is asked to defend it with evidence. Can't. Starts slandering and trying to distract from the issue at hand. Pretty pathetic. Put up or shut up, coward.

- No history of lying about rape. - Perfectly reasonable explanation for the Facebook exchanges that took place after the alleged rape. - Her behavior after the fact was not unusual or unheard of among rape victims. - Nungesser's behavior after the fact also fit her description of what...

Yeah, and there's plenty of reasonable doubt on both sides. The only difference is how people choose to interpret the available information. I'm the only one here not claiming that I know what actually happened.

Logic wins out again.

So you give up?

Most dishonest poster on Rerolled, everyone. Goes into full meltdown mode if anybody says something about him he believes is false. Writes 500-word essays demanding they prove their claims about him. Gleefully makes false claims about others without providing even a speck of evidence to...

Aha. So you acknowledge that expressing an opinion is different from stating a fact. Are you making a claim that God doesn't exist? If you are, can you prove this claim?

You presented a binary question to force me into a stance I intentionally am not taking. If my official answer is "I don't know" (and it is), then forcing me to say "yes" or "no" is dishonest and I'm not going to play that game.

Nope, she didn't say that. You are mistaken. She didn't say a single word that specifically applied to Hitman and not also to every other game in her list of 25+ games featuring the trope she was discussing.

You can't represent that numerically. It's an entirely feels-based stance, which is why I repeatedly stated how worthless our personal opinions are. I see plenty of circumstantial evidence that suggests she's telling the truth. Others believe they see circumstantial evidence that suggests she's...

All I'm doing is untying the knots others are ascribing to me. I've been open and honest and, above all, CONSISTENT with everything I've been saying. My stance has not changed, and my words very much reflect that. It's just the lies spread about me that I'm addressing, thank you.