Search results

This is what you accused khalid of except the same thing is applicable to you as shown by the "fixed" quote. explain how you aren't going off feels data

you can't prove shit moron

listen up buttercup, this is literally your position, nobody can metaphysically prove it either way.

that's the kind of thing potheads say

average income aardvark

Anal insurance advocate

what the fuck is an AIA?

"I wondered if what had happened between me and Paul was really sexual assault: there was no penetration, I had no bruises, I got away."

you forgot the next part. "I pushed him off and left the room quickly."

this article reads like a bullshit artist with every excuse in the book wrote it.

was rolling stone trying to cash in on false rape accusations? or was that sentance you said retarded?

wait are you saying that rolling stone purposefully went looking for a false rape accusation?

depends on how many departments are involved, if it's reporting compiled from all precincts across the country then yes i'd be more inclined to trust it over self selection survey's from a couple hundred people extrapolated for a whole country.

don't you have a memory? you fucking wrote it, it was like a page back, you turn into a pedantic obstructionist it's annoying, i'm not gonna spend 30 replies going back and forth cause you turned into a procedural weasel. and shut the fuck up with cupcake or honeychild or whatever infantilizing...

you don't actually have an opinion that they are narcissists, all you want is to undermine the people you've been white knighting for months now.

I wouldn't trust a behaviorist

being limited by your capacity to understand something will have us here forever too.

You don't have an opinion that those people are narcissists, you've been white knighting them for months now. So on the one hand you talk about them all the time, there's pages of correspondence of you talking about them, but you'll say that a person should not talk about them if they they are...

take the word 'supports' out, it's fine. fucker you don't actually believe in what you were saying.

oh so you don't actually have that opinion, you're just arguing in bad faith because it supports undermines opponents of your opinion.

so do you think any of the people mentioned in the gg thread are narcissistic attention whores?

is there some other realities that you belong to besides the common one?

telling someone to avoid a topic that you spend all your time on makes you a hypocrite

just like you do tanoomba, ignore the topic.

yeah then why have I read about prison guard unions spending money to lobby to do things like keep 3 strike laws on the books, or keep marijuana a criminal offense? edit: California Prison Guards Union Pushes For Prison Expansion Union Of the Snake: How California's Prison Guards Subvert...

lol social sciences

lol, no. they're just a symptom

did they put the greek houses under double secret probation?

You think that's the source of political correctness?

condem express complete disapproval of, typically in public

you're getting a bunch of resistance probably because you're condemning the person wearing blue socks, to some people that's offensive and you look like a dick.

It depends if you collectively act like pussies they'll take you over, look in mexico, the mormons fight the gangsters off but a lot of people just accept it, the lack of solidarity makes it easier for them to kill a bunch and put their bodies in the street.

yeah it's more than that it's like a gangster that gets angry with you if you wear blue socks.

political Islam exists and it acts like a gangster from time to time and they try to hold sway against the law the same way gangsters do, Christianity used to be the highest law and what you would call needlessly antagonistic behavior allowed you a moderate position to begin with.

she's probably equating lack of wanting to trash the judicial system to saying there's a denial

also it's not "extremists" that's another aspect of the problem tanoomba it's islam trying to be the highest authority that's the problem, the states that islam controls do things like pay money to kill people who "insult" islam, another one beheads people in the holiest place of islam, imagine...

nobody does because you're a contradictory mess that try's to live in these tiny gaps.

no, it's a real thing you have to deal with, because religion has in the past and present used legal and social pressure to shield their own intolerance. religion is the thing that most often calls for censorship for a reason. and no you're wrong btw, by saying never in the absolute sense...

that is of course unless the problem is your tolerance of intolerant hate

I got my parents off aol subscription when they had broadband and just wanted the email, they didn't even know it was free, but the interesting part was the salesman on the phone telling me all the stuff that comes with the subscription cause I asked him why I would even consider paying it...