Search results

I am threatening to kill you, then rape you, then hack you, but not hurt you.

you can share a little tanoomba, what's the most antagonistic thing you've done?

you really think you "got me" on some fantasy scenario you concocted but even in it's infantile smugness it's as juvenile as an insult as it is a complete thought. I have actually done something very similar having eaten psychedelic mushrooms which was grown with manure, reconstituted if you...

you seem to be immune to the idea of the logical consequences of your own ideas.

yes actually, if something pissed you off you're saying you wouldn't take a moment to express that?

did happen thanks for saying it

thanks for answering that you are respecting islam because you fear violence. do something i'm not supposed to? I do it all the time sometimes solely to affirm my lack of constraint by those whom I don't recognise authority.

here's another question tanoomba, do you think any of the current theocracies in the world will give up their power without antagonism and conflict? none of the previous ones did.

there is no person qualified to decide that quaid and that's exactly why the right to offend is critical to free speech

if there's no inherent respect then why do you not want people to draw muhammed why do you care at all? and by respect I mean the same way the mafia gains "respect".

also you still haven't addressed the inherent respect you have for a belief by self censoring yourself to its whims. You sidestepped it by trying to reframe the question I asked.

^see every post where you take agency away from islamists and place 100% of all action on one party.

being pissed off is the choice of one of the parties, you cannot claim that it's a one way street, what the other party chooses to be pissed off about is part of the equation. The fact that islam claims a special right up to and including violence for drawing the prophet muhammed you should find...

how is it being an asshole if you aren't inherently respecting that it's insulting to that belief? by acknowledging that drawing muhammad it somehow disrespectful you're automatically at some level respecting the belief.

you don't have a point to misunderstand, you just try to live in the gaps between sides you spineless wonder.

yeah tanoomba, the bullies are cartoonists not the religious gangster fascists that control massive oil wealth and use it to literally spread hatred of jews and westerners to billions of people, sometimes I wonder how retarded you are then I see you post in a thread that literally calls you...

alchemist being able to give an permanent aghs to anyone while taking up no slot seems insane

"Pretty weak" you know what wasn't weak the force it took to pull kevin loves arm out of its socket.

"tangled up" = yanking someones arm out of the socket, you can stop being a homer for boston anytime now.

Hodj argues like my mother, voluminously

didn't the russians prescribe "psychologists" to dissidents who basically tortured them? and psychology in russia still is still stained with fear and loathing?

actually nuremburg is a perfect example of why hodj is wrong now that I think about it, the top nazi's like goring and Hess ect HAD to be dealt with and were rightly dealt with, but all the mid level nazi scientists and intelligence or military officers that america needed to compete with Russia...

Go look at how they had to shut up Goring at Nuremberg because there was no way to convict him against his logic and they said that his line of reasoning and defense was forbidden for all other defendants.

if Germany had won the war they would have put the allies on trial and they would have lost those trials and been hung instead, that's only determined by the winners, another way to look at this this is, if every US president were held accountable by the principles of the Nuremberg trials they...

yeah and who pays for your research? cause it's not the academics. The hand that feeds is always above the hand that receives.

it's funny that hodj thinks the academics are ultimately in charge.

If there's no enforcement mechanism then it's like the league of nations, a good idea only. I mean there's some soft power there and influence but nothing is going to stop a country like china if they want to do it.

whatever minutia you want to cling to, to write a polemic about i'm sure somebody cares about but it's most likely not me.

all I was demonstrating is that "ethics" is an imaginary line, Under the right conditions can be cast aside.

because "it would never happen"

where do the tuskegee experiments rate with those medical ethics? or those psychologists that helped setup the cia's torture program after 9/11. The human radiation experiments? willowbrook state school? how about the GlaxoSmithKline human experiments that was only stopped in 2012.

you're right it was 2014 biological technologies office

DARPA opened a biological wing in like 2013, they're still working on the edges and hamstrung by that chimera act, but if the chinese make much headway you'll see that change exactly like the space race did with sputnik, it's interesting to note DARPA literally was built to as a reaction to sputnik.

i'm fairly sure the military is already spending money on it, the scientists don't pay for the research out of their own pocket you know. the chinese are big enough to make our military wary enough to spend money on it. Same with the space race.

the chinese will force our hand anyways, I think they'll go gung ho into it regardless if we don't and we'll jump into it just to prevent a gap Chinese scientists genetic modification human embryo CRISPR - Business Insider

Tsipras to Seize Public-Sector Funds to Keep Greece Afloat - Bloomberg Business

U.S. secretly tracked billions of calls for decades The government hides surveillance programs just because people would freak out | Trevor Timm | Comment is free | The Guardian MassPrivateI: DHS is influencing America's TV shows, movies, electric cars and much more! Want to See Domestic...

dp.