Search results

fixed. Hodj was saying that Dumar was neglecting the period of human history which according to Hodj's own statement couldn't possibly have a revolution. How is that portion of human history relevant then?

He was dismissing Dumar for neglecting the data points and in his own explanation of the data points explained why they deserved to be neglected.

The 1st Star Trek movie was the worst. Go ahead and try to rewatch it, I dare you.

[citation needed] ... Do you see why I think your arguments are sort of circular?

Baltimora's Tarzan Boy Define easily faked?

[citation needed]

Everyone I speak to who experiences Google Now for the 1st time thinks it's pretty damn cool. Smartphone innovation = smartphone intuitively managing more of your life.

Carry.

Future failed forum guild INCOMING

I guess you could make the argument that the game is worse now because it's harder to find an engaging group of players to complete content with. Some of this is the age of the game, but some of it is design decisions that practically discourage you from making an effort to form that group.

I didn't find an ecclectic bunch that didn't suck at the game back then either. The game was much easier from a skill standpoint, if not a time consumption standpoint. The question is are we better off now? Although I wasn't asking a question as much as making a statement, and that statement...

In 2015 there will be more 360/PS3 owners than Xbone/PS4 owners.

Yes, it was a blast. I enjoyed it despite it's simplicity, because this is what you do in MMO's. I'm not going to go Dumar on this thread and I think Ulduar was the best raid the game has ever produced, but to suggest you have to be wearing Rose-tinted glasses to remember enjoying vanilla WoW is...

What is the appeal of cookie clicker exactly?

His rework is only targeting his ult I think. Rengar that is, I'm way behind.

That's the spectator UI, not the in-game one. You aren't intended to know in game what the gold counts are per team and when your opponents' ults and summoners are available.

Meet Eomer: hipster mountain climber.

Only you ever say that.

Is Dumar really advocating suicide for people? Jesus Christ

Tell us more about your gummy ships

That's one of the most astute observations I've read.

You got it backwards dude. The two Jewish siblings and the JAP on the show were the most selfish self serving individuals. Joey and Phoebe were the ones watchers actually admired.

You were wrong, please stfu about it.

Oh. No, that's just confusing terminology. Liandry's applies from "spell damage", which generally means damage caused by champion spellcasts. Flay's passive just applies bonus "magic damage" which is just 1 of 3 damage types: magic, physical, or True damage. The two aren't really related.

??? If the target is slowed Liandry's does extra damage to them. This would include Thresh's flay.

Why does every MMO ad ever deal with some aspect of humans morphing into their toons? Has anyone done anything but make fun of this, ever? This one still wasn't as bad as the GW2 ad.

http://alt.org/nethack/soiled/

How could AP Corki possibly be good? None of his abilities have much scaling, AP does nothing for his great passive, and he has 0 CC. All you get is a short range caster with bleh late game damage and a good escape.

Probably a smurf account if someone was rocking Syndra to that degree in a pub leveling game.

Frasier is a fantastic and underrated show, but better than Seinfeld is a stretch.

She's not fun at all but she's a damage dealing beast.

Eh, she's still kinda crappy before she gets built and she isn't already built just by the bonuses from ARAM. She gets there fast enough though that she's a lot of fun.

He's still a pub stomping monster and permabanned at the ELO I play at.

Everyone in these forums(prev incarnation) was very excited about RDJ for Iron Man because he was a perfect cast.

Why isn't Amumu seen in competitive play? His susceptibility to counter-jungling?

Nope. It's a simple and common fallacy to assume that because x is more likely to have y that y is more likely to have x. You are rearranging my question. Just because it is likely that a murderer came from a single family home does not mean that it's likely that a single family home houses a...

And what percentage of those homes produce murderers? Are you arguing that it's the majority? That is what you're implying. Araysar, you never responded to my question of why it wasn't racist to suggest that the only positive relationship I would have with a black person was because I was...

Follow the bouncing ball, I'm only going to do this once. OBVIOUS IMPLICATION: One of these groups implies that the family being lived with is just like one that housed the black teens who murdered someone. Otherwise why bring it up? No, it isn't, you are just too stupid or willfully...

Haha that's right! Blacks don't have daddys! And all black males from single family households are murderers. No racism here guys. Pssst. The secret is just to imply, not outright state.